Penn-dixie Cement Co. Vs. Dickinson

Penn-dixie Cement Co. vs Dickinson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1952

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/98752

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/98752
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1952
Case Number: 344 U.S. 890
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Penn-dixie Cement Co.

Respondent

Dickinson

Excerpt

penn-dixie cement co. v. dickinson - 344 u.s. 890 (1952) u.s. supreme court penn-dixie cement co. v. dickinson , 344 u.s. 890 (1952) 344 u.s. 890 penn-dixie cement corporation, appellant, v. j. m. dickinson, commissioner of finance and taxation of tennessee et al. no. 408. supreme court of the united states november 24, 1952 appeal from the supreme court of tennessee. mr. charles c. moore, for appellant. messrs. roy h. beeler, attorney general of tennessee, and allison b. humphreys, solicitor general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.[ penn-dixie cement co. v. dickinson 344 u.s. 890 (1952) ]

Full Judgment

PENN-DIXIE CEMENT CO. v. DICKINSON - 344 U.S. 890 (1952)
U.S. Supreme Court PENN-DIXIE CEMENT CO. v. DICKINSON , 344 U.S. 890 (1952)

344 U.S. 890

PENN-DIXIE CEMENT CORPORATION, appellant,
v.
J. M. DICKINSON, Commissioner of Finance and Taxation of Tennessee et al.
No. 408.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 24, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Tennessee.

Mr. Charles C. Moore, for appellant.

Messrs. Roy H. Beeler, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Allison B. Humphreys, Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.[ Penn-Dixie Cement Co. v. Dickinson 344 U.S. 890 (1952) ]

Same Parties Penn-dixie Cement Co. vs Dickinson Same Subject Service Tax