Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ram Chandra Bind and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Ram Chandra Bind and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Chandra Bind and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....bihar -----opposite party ---------------- 06/- 13/01/2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned additional public prosecutor for the state. all the nine petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 149, 323, 427, 380, 504 of the indian penal code and 3 (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (x), (xv) of sc/st (poa) act, are named accused in this case of simple assault and abuse etc. submission is of general and omnibus allegation and the case is squarely covered under a decision of honble apex court in a case of jorgia pentiah vs. state of andhra pradesh reported in 2009 (1) bccr 15 (sc). considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, kaimur (bhabua), in connection with bhabua (sonhan) p.s. case no. 343 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under section 438 (2) of the code of criminal procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. ( akhilesh chandra, j.) praveen/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36561 o”

1. Ram Chandra Bind, Son of Mallu Bind. 2.Lachn Bind @ Laxhuman Bind, Son of Shyama Bind. 3.Surendra Bind, Son of Late Vishwanath Bind. 4.Munna Bind, Son of Late Sanehi Bind. 5.Rogi Bind, Son of Late Juthan Bind. 6.Dudh Nath Bind, Son of Late Bagedu Bind. 7.Kashi Bind, Son of Late Bhagat Bind. 8.Shiv Dular Bind, Son of Late Govind Bind. 9.Bagedan Bind, Son of Late Khobhari Bind. All R/o Village Rudrawar Kala Tola Sitampura, P.S. Sonhan, District Kaimur. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ---------------- 06/- 13/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the nine petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 427, 380, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (x), (xv) of SC/ST (POA) Act, are named accused in this case of simple assault and abuse etc. Submission is of general and omnibus allegation and the case is squarely covered under a decision of Honble Apex Court in a case of Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in 2009 (1) BCCR 15 (SC). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua), in connection with Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No. 343 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.) Praveen/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial