Ram Chandra Bind and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

Excerpt:

.....named accused in this case of simple assault and abuse etc. submission is of general and omnibus allegation and the case is squarely covered under a decision of honble apex court in a case of jorgia pentiah vs. state of andhra pradesh reported in 2009 (1) bccr 15 (sc). considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, kaimur (bhabua), in connection with bhabua (sonhan) p.s. case no. 343 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under section 438 (2) of the code of criminal procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. ( akhilesh chandra, j.) praveen/-

Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36561 o”

1. Ram Chandra Bind, Son of Mallu Bind. 2.Lachn Bind @ Laxhuman Bind, Son of Shyama Bind. 3.Surendra Bind, Son of Late Vishwanath Bind. 4.Munna Bind, Son of Late Sanehi Bind. 5.Rogi Bind, Son of Late Juthan Bind. 6.Dudh Nath Bind, Son of Late Bagedu Bind. 7.Kashi Bind, Son of Late Bhagat Bind. 8.Shiv Dular Bind, Son of Late Govind Bind. 9.Bagedan Bind, Son of Late Khobhari Bind. All R/o Village Rudrawar Kala Tola Sitampura, P.S. Sonhan, District Kaimur. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ---------------- 06/- 13/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the nine petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 427, 380, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (x), (xv) of SC/ST (POA) Act, are named accused in this case of simple assault and abuse etc. Submission is of general and omnibus allegation and the case is squarely covered under a decision of Honble Apex Court in a case of Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in 2009 (1) BCCR 15 (SC). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua), in connection with Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No. 343 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.) Praveen/-