Pramod Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Pramod Kumar vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974652

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974652
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2012
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pramod Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.114 o”1. pramod kumar son of late chandrashekhar rajak resident of village - baro, uttari, p.o.- baro, p.s. - phulwariya, district - begusarai versus 1. the state of bihar through the deputy development commissioner, district village development agency, begusarai, district - begusarai 2. the block development officer, teghra, district - begusarai 3. the mukhiya , gram panchayat raj baro, uttari, district - begusarai *******”12. 01/2012 counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the district magistrate, begusarai as respondent no.4. heard counsel for the petitioner and the state. in this case, a notice has been issued to the petitioner, who is a public distribution system dealer to deposit the cost of 109 quintols 42 kgs. and 500 gms of rice at apl rates which was given for distribution under the sampoorna gramin rozgar yojana. this case would be covered by the orders passed today in cwjc no. 136 of 2012. this court further finds that the mukhiya has no authority to issue the notice as contained in annexure-1. this court, therefore, quashes annexure- 1. this writ application is allowed to the extent 2 indicated aforesaid. anand ( sheema ali khan, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.114 o”

1. Pramod Kumar Son Of Late Chandrashekhar Rajak Resident Of Village - Baro, Uttari, P.O.- Baro, P.S. - Phulwariya, District - Begusarai Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Deputy Development Commissioner, District Village Development Agency, Begusarai, District - Begusarai 2. The Block Development Officer, Teghra, District - Begusarai 3. The Mukhiya , Gram Panchayat Raj Baro, Uttari, District - Begusarai *******”

12. 01/2012 Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Magistrate, Begusarai as respondent no.

4. Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the State. In this case, a notice has been issued to the petitioner, who is a Public Distribution System Dealer to deposit the cost of 109 quintols 42 Kgs. And 500 gms of rice at APL rates which was given for distribution under the SAMPOORNA GRAMIN ROZGAR YOJANA. This case would be covered by the orders passed today in CWJC No. 136 of 2012. This Court further finds that the Mukhiya has no authority to issue the notice as contained in Annexure-1. This Court, therefore, quashes Annexure- 1. This writ application is allowed to the extent 2 indicated aforesaid. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Pramod Kumar vs The State of Bihar and ors Same Subject Right to Information