Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anuradha and anr Vs. State and ors

Anuradha and anr vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Dec 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973407

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anuradha and anr

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

.....anuradha & anr. vs. state of rajasthan & ors. date of order ::19. 12.2012 honble ms.justice nirmaljit kaur mr.sanjay nahar, for the petitioners. mr.kamlesh rawal, pp for the state. nirmaljit kaur, j.(oral): this is criminal misc. petition under section 482 of the cr.p.c. seeking fair investigation and direction to the investigating agency not to harass the petitioners in connection with fir no.152/2012 registered at police station kelwa, district rajsamand for offence under section 363 & 366 of the i.p.c. the respondent no.5 filed a complaint against the three person on 6.8.2012. on this complaint, an fir no152/2012 was registered at police station kelwa on 18.08.2012. as per the complainant, her daughter kumari aarti who is minor, was at the house of his brother-in-law kailash in the summer vacation of 2012. on 21.06.2012, his daughter was found missing in the night at around 3:30 pm, the information of which was given to the police station kelwa by his brother-in-law kailash. on 23rd and 24th of june, 2012, the police called up the accused narayan lal 2 and his wife at the police station pratap nagar, bhilwara where these two accused admitted that complainant's daughter arti was with accused chetan but now they do not know the whereabouts of chetan and arti. the present petitioners are relatives of the accused persons. petitioner no.1 is stated to be sister of chetan and petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law of the said accused. under these circumstances, the police are unnecessarily harassing the petitioners and putting undue pressure on them. the petitioners have given representation to the superintendent of police, rajsamand but nothing has been done. one such representation has recently been given on 24.11.2012 but no action has been taken and the petitioners have every apprehension that they will be continued to harass. in view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to superintendent of police, rajsamand to look into the.....

Full Judgment

1 83 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.2960/2012 Anuradha & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::

19. 12.2012 HONBLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Mr.Sanjay Nahar, for the petitioners. Mr.Kamlesh Rawal, PP for the State. Nirmaljit Kaur, J.

(Oral): This is criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking fair investigation and direction to the Investigating Agency not to harass the petitioners in connection with FIR No.152/2012 registered at Police Station Kelwa, District Rajsamand for offence under Section 363 & 366 of the I.P.C. The respondent No.5 filed a complaint against the three person on 6.8.2012. On this complaint, an FIR No152/2012 was registered at Police Station Kelwa on 18.08.2012. As per the complainant, her daughter Kumari Aarti who is minor, was at the house of his brother-in-law Kailash in the summer vacation of 2012. On 21.06.2012, his daughter was found missing in the night at around 3:30 PM, the information of which was given to the Police Station Kelwa by his brother-in-law Kailash. On 23rd and 24th of June, 2012, the police called up the accused Narayan Lal 2 and his wife at the Police Station Pratap Nagar, Bhilwara where these two accused admitted that complainant's daughter Arti was with accused Chetan but now they do not know the whereabouts of Chetan and Arti. The present petitioners are relatives of the accused persons. Petitioner No.1 is stated to be sister of Chetan and petitioner No.2 is brother-in-law of the said accused. Under these circumstances, the police are unnecessarily harassing the petitioners and putting undue pressure on them. The petitioners have given representation to the Superintendent of Police, Rajsamand but nothing has been done. One such representation has recently been given on 24.11.2012 but no action has been taken and the petitioners have every apprehension that they will be continued to harass. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to Superintendent of Police, Rajsamand to look into the representation of the petitioner and take appropriate measures, if required, in accordance with law. The criminal misc. petition is disposed of in the above terms. (NIRMALJIT KAUR), J.

NK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial