Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sharpe Vs. Buchanan

Sharpe vs Buchanan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-14-1942
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/97262
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
317 U.S. 238

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sharpe

Respondent

Buchanan

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes - an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed - then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

..... 284 ky. 88, 143 s.w.2d 857. the circuit court of appeals denied a petition for rehearing, 133 f.2d 100, when it appeared that an application for habeas corpus, filed in a state court after the circuit court of appeals had rendered its judgment, was still pending on appeal in the page 317 u. s. 239 kentucky court of appeals. after the petition for certiorari was filed here, the kentucky court of appeals affirmed the state court's order denying habeas corpus. sharpe v. commonwealth, ky., 165 s.w.2d 993, decided november 13, 1942. it thus appears that this obstacle to a consideration of the merits of petitioner's application, which the circuit court of appeals encountered, has now been removed. the judgment is therefore vacated, without costs, and the cause remanded to the circuit court of appeals for such further proceedings as it may deem appropriate. so ordered.

Full Judgment

Sharpe v. Buchanan - 317 U.S. 238 (1942)
U.S. Supreme Court Sharpe v. Buchanan, 317 U.S. 238 (1942)

Sharpe v. Buchanan

No. 525

Decided December 14, 1942

317 U.S. 238

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE

CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

Where a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the District Court's refusal of habeas corpus was upon the sole ground that the applicant, who was confined in a state penitentiary, had not applied for habeas corpus to the state courts, this Court vacated the judgment because, after the filing of the petition for certiorari here, habeas corpus had been expressly refused by the State's highest court. P. 317 U. S. 238 .

121 F.2d 448 vacated.

Petition for writ of certiorari to review the affirmance of a judgment denying habeas corpus, 36 F.Supp. 386.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the petition for certiorari is also granted. It appears from the record that, after a hearing, the district court denied an application for habeas corpus filed by petitioner, who is confined in a state penitentiary pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a state court. The circuit court of appeals affirmed the district court's order, 121 F.2d 448, on the sole ground that petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies by applying to the state courts for habeas corpus, although an application for a writ of error coram nobis had previously been denied by the Kentucky Court of Appeals. Sharpe v. Commonwealth, 284 Ky. 88, 143 S.W.2d 857. The circuit court of appeals denied a petition for rehearing, 133 F.2d 100, when it appeared that an application for habeas corpus, filed in a state court after the circuit court of appeals had rendered its judgment, was still pending on appeal in the

Page 317 U. S. 239

Kentucky Court of Appeals. After the petition for certiorari was filed here, the Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the state court's order denying habeas corpus. Sharpe v. Commonwealth, Ky., 165 S.W.2d 993, decided November 13, 1942. It thus appears that this obstacle to a consideration of the merits of petitioner's application, which the circuit court of appeals encountered, has now been removed. The judgment is therefore vacated, without costs, and the cause remanded to the circuit court of appeals for such further proceedings as it may deem appropriate.

So ordered.


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial