Ramchandra Sahu and Another Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Ramchandra Sahu and Another vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 17, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972613

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/972613
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Jun 17, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramchandra Sahu and Another

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....hereby,rejected. cr.appeal(db)no.756of2012 1. thiscriminalappealhasbeenadmittedvideorderdated31stjuly,2012. recordsandproceedingsofsessionstrialno.355of2008/99of2009was calledforfromthetrialcourtsoastoreachtothiscourtforappreciatingthe argumentforsuspensionofsentence.2. recordsandproceedingsofsessionstrialhasbeenreceivedbythiscourt andwehave perusedthe same andheardthe learnedcounsel for boththe sides”3. lookingtotheevidencesonrecord,itappearsthatthepresentappellant isoriginalaccusedno.4inthesessionstrial.lookingtothedepositiongiven by p.w.1, p.w.4, p.w.5 and p.w.7, there is prima facie case in favour of the appellant.theappellanthascausedinjurytotheinjuredeyewitnesswhois p.w.5bylathi.lookingtotheseevidencesonrecord, weherebysuspendthe sentenceawardedtothepresentappellant,namely,prakashsahu@prakash sahusao,uponexecutionofbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthetrialcourt (learned additional sessions judge vi, ranchi) in connection with sessions trialno.355of2008/99of2009arisingoutofratup.s.caseno.55of2008 correspondingtog.r.no.1108of2008,ontheconditionthattheappellant shallremainpresentbeforethiscourtasandwhenhispresenceisrequiredby thiscourt. (d.n.patel,j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) ajay/

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.661of2012 With Cr.Appeal(DB)No.756of2012 1.RamchandraSahu 2.AmardeepSahu Appellants(InCr.AppealNo.661/12) PrakashSahu@PrakashSahuSaoAppellant(InCr.AppealNo.756/12) Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent(Inbothcases) CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellants :Mr.M.K.Habib,Advocate(InCr.Appeal661/12) FortheAppellant :Mr.P .P.N.Roy,Sr.Advocate(InCr.Appeal756/12) FortheRespondent:A.P .P. 20/Dated:17 th June,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.: Cr.Appeal(DB)No.661of2012 1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of appellant no. 2 tenderinghisunconditionalapologyoffilingofaforgeddocumenti.e.School Leaving Certificate of appellant no.

2. The said document was forged and fabricatedanditwascontendedthatappellantno.2isminorandI.A.No.1226 of2013whichisfiledonbehalfofappellantno.2isnowtobewithdrawn.This affidavitistakenonrecord.

2. Accordingly,I.A.No.1226of2013isdisposedofaswithdrawn.

3. Thisappealhasbeenadmittedvideorderdated9th July,2012.Records andproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.355of2008/99of2009wascalledfor fromthetrialcourtsoastoreachtothisCourtforappreciatingtheargument forsuspensionofsentence.

4. RecordsandproceedingsofSessionsTrialhasbeenreceivedbythisCourt andwehave perusedthe same andheardthe learnedcounsel for boththe sides.

5. Lookingtotheevidencesonrecord,itappearsthatthepresentappellants are original accused nos. 1 and 5 in the Sessions Trial. They have been punishedmainlyfortheoffencepunishableunderSection302oftheIndian 2 PenalCodeforlifeimprisonment.

6. Looking to the evidences on record, there is prima facie case against theseappellants.Asthecriminalappealispending,wearenotmuchanalyzing theevidencesonrecord,but,sufficeittosaythatthecaseoftheprosecutionis baseduponthedepositionsoftheseveraleyewitnesseswhoareP.W.1,P.W.4, P.W.5andP.W.7.P.W.7isaninformant.Lookingtothedepositionsoftheseeye witnesses,theyhaveclearlynarratedtheroleplayedbythesetwoappellants. The appellants have caused injury upon the deceased by sharp cutting instrument as well as by lathi which has resulted into the death of the deceased.Thedepositionoftheeyewitnessesisconstitutingaprimafaciecase againsttheseappellants.Moreover,depositionoftheseeyewitnessesisgetting enoughcorroborationbythedepositiongivenbyDr.AnitaSundi(P.W.9Court WitnessNo.1).Lookingtotheseevidencesonrecord,thereisprimafaciecase and,therefore,lookingtothegravityofoffence,quantumofpunishmentand the manner in which these two appellants are involved in the offences as alleged by the prosecution and looking to the prima facie case, we are not inclinedtosuspendthesentenceawardedtothembythetrialcourt.Thereis nosubstanceintheprayerforsuspensionofsentenceand,hence,thesameis, hereby,rejected. Cr.Appeal(DB)No.756of2012 1. Thiscriminalappealhasbeenadmittedvideorderdated31stJuly,2012. RecordsandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.355of2008/99of2009was calledforfromthetrialcourtsoastoreachtothisCourtforappreciatingthe argumentforsuspensionofsentence.

2. RecordsandproceedingsofSessionsTrialhasbeenreceivedbythisCourt andwehave perusedthe same andheardthe learnedcounsel for boththe sides”

3. Lookingtotheevidencesonrecord,itappearsthatthepresentappellant isoriginalaccusedno.4intheSessionsTrial.Lookingtothedepositiongiven by P.W.1, P.W.4, P.W.5 and P.W.7, there is prima facie case in favour of the appellant.Theappellanthascausedinjurytotheinjuredeyewitnesswhois P.W.5bylathi.Lookingtotheseevidencesonrecord, weherebysuspendthe sentenceawardedtothepresentappellant,namely,PrakashSahu@Prakash SahuSao,uponexecutionofbailbondofRs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthetrialCourt (learned Additional Sessions Judge VI, Ranchi) in connection with Sessions TrialNo.355of2008/99of2009arisingoutofRatuP.S.CaseNo.55of2008 correspondingtoG.R.No.1108of2008,ontheconditionthattheappellant shallremainpresentbeforethisCourtasandwhenhispresenceisrequiredby thisCourt. (D.N.Patel,J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Ajay/

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Ramchandra Sahu and Another vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education