Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

RobIn Kumar Bardhan Vs. Director Planning Special Rail

RobIn Kumar Bardhan vs Director Planning Special Rail

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Mar 06, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971822

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RobIn Kumar Bardhan

Respondent

Director Planning Special Rail

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p.(s)no.7480of2011 robinkumarbardhan .... .... .... petitioner versus director,planningspecialrailwayboard,newdelhi .... .... .... respondent coram :hon'blethechiefjustice hon'blemrs.justicejayaroy forthepetitioner :mr.jayprakashpandey,advocate fortherespondent :mr.ramnivasroy,advocate mr.jalisurrahman,advocate th orderno.12 dated,6 march,2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. petitioners o.a. was dismissed vide order dated 5th february,2010bythec.a.t.,patnabench,(circuitbench,ranchi) afterobservingthatpetitionercouldnotmakeclearwhetherhewas givenappointmentandalsohecouldnotmakeoutwhyhewasnot allowedtoworkandhedidnotproduceanyappointmentorder. reply has been filed by the respondent to indicate that the petitionerwasgivenappointmentoncontractualbasisintheyear 2007andforshortperiodheworked,andthereafter,hedidnot turnup,therefore,hiscontractualappointmentwascancelled. wedonotfindanymeritinthispetition.accordingly, thispetitionisdismissed. (prakashtatia,c.j.) (jayaroy,j.) si/anit

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.7480of2011 RobinKumarBardhan .... .... .... Petitioner Versus Director,PlanningSpecialRailwayBoard,NewDelhi .... .... .... Respondent CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.JayPrakashPandey,Advocate FortheRespondent :Mr.RamNivasRoy,Advocate Mr.JalisurRahman,Advocate th OrderNo.12 Dated,6 March,2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Petitioners O.A. was dismissed vide order dated 5th February,2010bytheC.A.T.,PatnaBench,(CircuitBench,Ranchi) afterobservingthatpetitionercouldnotmakeclearwhetherhewas givenappointmentandalsohecouldnotmakeoutwhyhewasnot allowedtoworkandhedidnotproduceanyappointmentorder. Reply has been filed by the respondent to indicate that the petitionerwasgivenappointmentoncontractualbasisintheyear 2007andforshortperiodheworked,andthereafter,hedidnot turnup,therefore,hiscontractualappointmentwascancelled. Wedonotfindanymeritinthispetition.Accordingly, thispetitionisdismissed. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial