Skip to content
Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Laing Vs. Fox

Laing vs Fox

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1934
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/96056
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
293 U.S. 525

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Laing

Respondent

Fox

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

laing v. fox - 293 u.s. 525 (1934) u.s. supreme court laing v. fox, 293 u.s. 525 (1934) 293 u.s. 525 john laing, appellant, v. fred l. fox, state tax commissioner of the state of west virginia. no. 433. supreme court of the united states october 22, 1934 mr. arthur s. dayton, of charleston, w. va., for appellant. mr. homer a. holt, for appellee. for opinion below, see 175 s. e. 354. per curiam. the motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) southwestern oil co. v. texas, 217 u.s. 114, 121 , 30 s. ct. 496; brown-forman co. v. kentucky, 217 u.s. 563 , 572 et seq., 30 s. ct. 578; american sugar refining co. v. louisiana, 179 u.s. 89, 95 , 21 s. ct. 43; hicklin v. coney, 290 u.s. 169, 176 , 54 s. ct. 142. (2) league v. texas, 184 u.s. 156, 161 , 22 s. ct. 475; kentucky union co. v. kentucky, 219 u.s. 140 , 152- 153, 31 s. ct. 171; a. magnano co. v. hamilton, 292 u.s. 40, 44 , 54 s. ct. 599. (3) supreme lodge, knights of pythias v. meyer, 265 u.s. 30, 32 , 33 s., 44 s. ct. 432; h

Full Judgment

LAING v. FOX - 293 U.S. 525 (1934)
U.S. Supreme Court LAING v. FOX, 293 U.S. 525 (1934)

293 U.S. 525

John LAING, appellant,
v.
Fred L. FOX, State Tax Commissioner of the State of West Virginia.
No. 433.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 22, 1934

Mr. Arthur S. Dayton, of Charleston, W. Va., for appellant.

Mr. Homer A. Holt, for appellee.

For opinion below, see 175 S. E. 354.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial Federal question. (1) Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U.S. 114, 121 , 30 S. Ct. 496; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. 563 , 572 et seq., 30 S. Ct. 578; American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U.S. 89, 95 , 21 S. Ct. 43; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169, 176 , 54 S. Ct. 142. (2) League v. Texas, 184 U.S. 156, 161 , 22 S. Ct. 475; Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U.S. 140 , 152- 153, 31 S. Ct. 171; A. Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U.S. 40, 44 , 54 S. Ct. 599. (3) Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32 , 33 S., 44 S. Ct. 432; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169, 172 , 54 S. Ct. 142; Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co., 291 U.S. 352, 358 , 54 S. Ct. 392; Swiss Oil Corporation v. Shanks, 273 U.S. 407, 413 , 47 S. Ct. 393.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial