Ross Vs. Fort

Ross vs Fort

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1933

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/95874

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/95874
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1933
Case Number: 290 U.S. 603
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ross

Respondent

Fort

Excerpt

ross v. fort - 290 u.s. 603 (1933) u.s. supreme court ross v. fort, 290 u.s. 603 (1933) 290 u.s. 603 lida m. ross, appellant, v. dancey fort, commissioner of finance and taxation of the state of tennessee. no. 613. supreme court of the united states december 18, 1933 appeal from the supreme court of the state of tennessee. mr. j. a. fowler, of knoxville, tenn., for appellant. for opinion below, see 61 s.w.(2d) 479. per curiam. the appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) maguire v. trefry, 253 u.s. 12 , 40 s. ct. 417; (2) klein v. board of supervisors, 282 u.s. 19 , 22-24, 51 s. ct. 15, 73 a. l. r. 679; magoun v. illinois trust & savings bank, 170 u.s. 283, 298 , 299 s., 18 s. ct. 594; keeney v. new york, 222 u.s. 525, 535 , 536 s., 32 s. ct. 105; standard stock food co. v. wright, 225 u.s. 540, 550 , 32 s. ct. 784.[ ross v. fort 290 u.s. 603 (1933) ]

Full Judgment

ROSS v. FORT - 290 U.S. 603 (1933)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSS v. FORT, 290 U.S. 603 (1933)

290 U.S. 603

Lida M. ROSS, appellant,
v.
Dancey FORT, Commissioner of Finance and Taxation of the State of Tennessee.
No. 613.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 18, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.

Mr. J. A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

For opinion below, see 61 S.W.(2d) 479.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial Federal question. (1) Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U.S. 12 , 40 S. Ct. 417; (2) Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19 , 22-24, 51 S. Ct. 15, 73 A. L. R. 679; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 298 , 299 S., 18 S. Ct. 594; Keeney v. New York, 222 U.S. 525, 535 , 536 S., 32 S. Ct. 105; Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540, 550 , 32 S. Ct. 784.[ Ross v. Fort 290 U.S. 603 (1933) ]

Same Parties Ross vs Fort Same Subject Land Acquisition