Healy Vs. Ratta

Healy vs Ratta

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1933

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/95868

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/95868
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1933
Case Number: 288 U.S. 593
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Healy

Respondent

Ratta

Excerpt

healy v. ratta - 288 u.s. 593 (1933) u.s. supreme court healy v. ratta, 288 u.s. 593 (1933) 288 u.s. 593 michael j. healy, chief of police of the city of manchester, new hampshire appellant, v. louis d. ratta. no. 669. supreme court of the united states february 20, 1933 mr. thornton lorimer, of rochester, n. h., for appellant. mr. william n. rogers, of concord, n. h., for appellee. for opinion below, see 1 f. supp. 669. in this case probable jurisdiction is noted. the court desires to hear argument upon the questions: (a) whether a case for equitable relief is shown; (b) whether the amount in controversy is such as to sustain the jurisdiction of the court below; and (c) whether the defendant-appellant is a state officer within the meaning of section 266, judicial code, as amended (43 stat. 936, 938, u. s. code, title 28, 380 [28 usca 380]). the motion to advance is granted and the case is assigned for argument on monday, march 13, next, after the cases heretofore assigned for that day.[ healy v. ratta 288 u.s. 593 (1933) ]

Full Judgment

HEALY v. RATTA - 288 U.S. 593 (1933)
U.S. Supreme Court HEALY v. RATTA, 288 U.S. 593 (1933)

288 U.S. 593

Michael J. HEALY, Chief of Police of the City of Manchester, New Hampshire appellant,
v.
Louis D. RATTA.
No. 669.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 20, 1933

Mr. Thornton Lorimer, of Rochester, N. H., for appellant.

Mr. William N. Rogers, of Concord, N. H., for appellee.

For opinion below, see 1 F. Supp. 669.

In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. The Court desires to hear argument upon the questions: (a) whether a case for equitable relief is shown; (b) whether the amount in controversy is such as to sustain the jurisdiction of the Court below; and (c) whether the defendant-appellant is a state officer within the meaning of section 266, Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938, U. S. Code, title 28, 380 [28 USCA 380]). The motion to advance is granted and the case is assigned for argument on Monday, March 13, next, after the cases heretofore assigned for that day.[ Healy v. Ratta 288 U.S. 593 (1933) ]

Same Parties Healy vs Ratta Same Subject Land Acquisition