Deepak Kumar and Others Vs. State and Another

Deepak Kumar and Others vs State and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 28, 2012

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/948070

CiteSignal

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/948070
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Suresh Kait
Decided On: Mar 28, 2012
Case Number: CRL.M.C. No. 1098 OF 2012, 1099 OF 2012, 1100 OF 2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak Kumar and Others

Respondent

State and Another

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes - an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed - then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

.....acceptable to the family members of meenu. they did not succumb to the dectate of her family. they continued to fight with the strong determination that they would marry to each other. since, this marriage would be in inter-caste, therefore, by breaking the caste barrier, finally they succeeded and tied them in a knot of marriage.8. now all of them become close relatives to each, therefore, the matters have been settled.9. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i deem it appropriate to quash fir no. 74/2009 for the offences punishable under section 354/509/506/34 indian penal code, 1860, fir no. 75/2009 for the offences punishable under section 323/354/509/506 and fir no. 76/2009 for the offences punishable under section 324/34 indian penal code, 1860 all registered at ps-kalyan puri.10. accordingly, crl. m.c.1098/2012, crl. m.c.1099/2012 and crl. m.c.1100/2012 are hereby allowed.11. dasti.

Full Judgment

SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT (Oral)

Crl.M.A.No.3882/2012(exemption) in Crl. M.C. 1098/2012

Crl.M.A.No.3866/2012(exemption) in Crl. M.C. 1099/2012

Crl.M.A.No.3887/2012(exemption) in Crl. M.C. 1100/2012

Exemption applications allowed subject to just exceptions. Criminal M.A.s stand disposed of.

+ CRL.M.C. 1098/2012

+ CRL.M.C. 1099/2012

+ CRL.M.C. 1100/2012

1. Vide the instant petitions, petitioners have sought for quashing of FIR no. 74 dated 01.04.2009 registered for the offences punishable under Section 354/509/506/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860, FIR no. 75 dated 01.04.2009 for the offences punishable under Section 323/354/509/506 and FIR no. 76/2009 dated 02.04.2009 for the offences punishable under Section 324/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 all registered at PS-Kalyan Puri.

2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners submits that all the three FIRs are crossed FIR against both the parties.

3. It is further submitted that now the parties have entered into a settlement and all the respondents settled all the issues qua the aforesaid FIR, therefore, they are no more interested to pursue the case mentioned above. Therefore, instant petitions may be allowed.

4. All the respondents / complainants of the FIRs are personally present in the court with their counsel namely Mr. Navin Singh, Advocate. SI Pawan Kumar, IO of the Case present in the court has identified all the respondents / complainants.5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submit that all the respondents have settled all the issues qua the FIRs mentioned above against all the petitioners and are no more interested to pursue the case further.6. FIR no.74/2009, lodged on the complaint of Meenu against her neighbourers namely Pradeep Kr. Garg, Rajiv Garg and Mohit Garg by fianc of Aman Richard / daughter of Smt. Saroj Devi. FIR no. 75/2009, lodged on the complaint made by Smt. Saroj Devi against Aman Richard (now her son-in-law). FIR no. 76/2009, lodged on the complaint made by Aman Richard against Deepak Kumar (now his brother-in-law).7. Aman Richard and Meenu are of a new generation. They were in love. They wanted to be life partners, which was not acceptable to the family members of Meenu. They did not succumb to the dectate of her family. They continued to fight with the strong determination that they would marry to each other. Since, this marriage would be in inter-caste, therefore, by breaking the caste barrier, finally they succeeded and tied them in a knot of marriage.8. Now all of them become close relatives to each, therefore, the matters have been settled.9. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to quash FIR No. 74/2009 for the offences punishable under Section 354/509/506/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860, FIR no. 75/2009 for the offences punishable under Section 323/354/509/506 and FIR no. 76/2009 for the offences punishable under Section 324/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 all registered at PS-Kalyan Puri.10. Accordingly, Crl. M.C.1098/2012, Crl. M.C.1099/2012 and Crl. M.C.1100/2012 are hereby allowed.11. Dasti.