Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K. Jayaraman Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Coimbatore

K. Jayaraman vs Commissioner of Customs, Coimbatore

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Sep 13, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/944241

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
D.M. No. 11 to 15 of 2010 & C/S/74 to 78 of 2010 & C/84 to 88 of 2010
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K. Jayaraman

Advocate None for the Appellant. Shri C. Rangaraju, SDR for the Respondent.

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs, Coimbatore

Excerpt

per jyoti balasundaram 1. in all the above five appeals, registry had issued notices for removal of defects. in spite of several such notices, the defects continue. none appears for the appellant also in spite of notice. hence these appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution along with the stay applications.

Full Judgment

Per Jyoti Balasundaram

1. In all the above five appeals, Registry had issued notices for removal of defects. In spite of several such notices, the defects continue. None appears for the appellant also in spite of notice. Hence these appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution along with the stay applications.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial