Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Madras Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai

Madras Cements Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Mar 29, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/942432

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Appeal No.E/220 of 2009
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Madras Cements Ltd.

Advocate Shri R.Parthasarathy, Consultant. Shri T.H.Rao, SDR

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai

Excerpt

heard both sides. in view of the fact that the issue of denying cenvat credit on welding electrodes used in repair and maintenance of machinery has been settled by the decision of the hon’ble supreme court in the case of sail vs commissioner - 2008 (229) elt a127 (sc), the appeal of the appellants has no merit and hence the same is dismissed.

Full Judgment

Heard both sides. In view of the fact that the issue of denying CENVAT credit on welding electrodes used in repair and maintenance of machinery has been settled by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of SAIL Vs Commissioner - 2008 (229) ELT A127 (SC), the appeal of the appellants has no merit and hence the same is dismissed.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chen... Same Parties Madras Cements Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Same Subject Excise Same Judge The Honourable Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Technical Member
Excise

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales