R.K. Tripathi Vs. Union of India Through Secretary to Govt. of India and Others

R.K. Tripathi vs Union of India Through Secretary to Govt. of India and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi Decided May 20, 2009

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/940310

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/940310
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Judge: V.K. Bali, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Dr. Justice Veena Chhotray, Administrative Member
Decided On: May 20, 2009
Case Number: OA 1346 of 2009
Subject: Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service

Key legal issue: Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.K. Tripathi

Advocate For the Appellant: D.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: -----, Advocate.

Respondent

Union of India Through Secretary to Govt. of India and Others

Excerpt

order (oral) justice v.k. bali, chairman counsel, at this stage, limits his relief to the extent that direction be issued to the respondents only to re-consider applicants transfer to guwahati when mrs. meera dixit, who made a complaint against the applicant of outraging her modesty and on the basis of which the applicant is being departmentally tried, has withdrawn her complaint. the limited prayer made by the applicant, as mentioned above, needs to be accepted. it appears to this tribunal that pending departmental enquiry on the allegations made by mrs. meera dixit, the applicant has been transferred. he has a very limited time for superannuation. if mrs. meera dixit may have actually withdrawn her complaint against the applicant, it would be for the respondents to reconsider his transfer to guwahati. 2. in the circumstances, as mentioned above, we dispose of this original application with direction to the respondents to reconsider the transfer of the applicant to guwahati, if it be a fact that mrs. meera dixit has withdrawn her complaint against him. while keeping in view that the applicant is to retire in near future, let the directions, as ordained above, be complied with as expeditiously as possible and preferably within two weeks from today. 3. with the directions, as mentioned above, this original application stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

Order (Oral)

Justice V.K. Bali, Chairman

Counsel, at this stage, limits his relief to the extent that direction be issued to the respondents only to re-consider applicants transfer to Guwahati when Mrs. Meera Dixit, who made a complaint against the applicant of outraging her modesty and on the basis of which the applicant is being departmentally tried, has withdrawn her complaint. The limited prayer made by the applicant, as mentioned above, needs to be accepted. It appears to this Tribunal that pending departmental enquiry on the allegations made by Mrs. Meera Dixit, the applicant has been transferred. He has a very limited time for superannuation. If Mrs. Meera Dixit may have actually withdrawn her complaint against the applicant, it would be for the respondents to reconsider his transfer to Guwahati.

2. In the circumstances, as mentioned above, we dispose of this Original Application with direction to the respondents to reconsider the transfer of the applicant to Guwahati, if it be a fact that Mrs. Meera Dixit has withdrawn her complaint against him. While keeping in view that the applicant is to retire in near future, let the directions, as ordained above, be complied with as expeditiously as possible and preferably within two weeks from today.

3. With the directions, as mentioned above, this Original Application stands disposed of.

Same Court & Year Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi · 2009 Same Parties R.K. Tripathi vs Union of India Through Secretary to Govt. of... Same Subject Service Same Judge V.K. Bali, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Dr. Justice Veena Ch...