Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smith Vs. Icc

Smith vs icc

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-05-1917
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/92548

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
245 U.S. 47
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

icc

Excerpt

smith v. icc - 245 u.s. 47 (1917) u.s. supreme court smith v. icc, 245 u.s. 47 (1917) smith v. interstate commerce commission no. 339 argued october 3, 1917 decided november 5, 1917 245 u.s. 47 appeal from the supreme court of the district of columbia syllabus decided on the authority of smith v. interstate commerce commission, ante, 245 u. s. 33 . affirmed. the case is stated in the opinion. mr. justice mc kenna delivered the opinion of the court. this case was heard with no. 337, just decided, ante, 245 u. s. 33 . like the latter case, it was based on a proceeding brought by the interstate commerce commission in the supreme court of the district of columbia to enforce answers to certain questions asked of appellant by the commission, and which he refused to answer upon the advice of counsel. the petition and reply thereto are the same as in no. 337, and present for decision the same propositions. the court entered an order requiring appellant to answer questions to the following effect: 1st, whether he had personal knowledge of funds of the louisville & nashville railroad used for political page 245 u. s. 48 campaign purposes in the state of tennessee and charged on the books of the carrier to operating expenses or construction account, and second, whether he had personal knowledge of funds of the louisville & nashville railroad used for campaign purposes in the state of kentucky and charged on the books of the carrier to construction account or operating expenses. it will be observed that the questions are limited, as some of the questions in no. 337 were, to the allocation upon the books of the company, of the funds expended, if any. they are within the reasoning of the opinion in no. 337 and, on the authority of that case, the order is affirmed.

Full Judgment

Smith v. ICC - 245 U.S. 47 (1917)
U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. ICC, 245 U.S. 47 (1917)

Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission

No. 339

Argued October 3, 1917

Decided November 5, 1917

245 U.S. 47

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SYLLABUS

Decided on the authority of Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission, ante, 245 U. S. 33 .

Affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE Mc KENNA delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was heard with No. 337, just decided, ante, 245 U. S. 33 . Like the latter case, it was based on a proceeding brought by the Interstate Commerce Commission in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to enforce answers to certain questions asked of appellant by the Commission, and which he refused to answer upon the advice of counsel.

The petition and reply thereto are the same as in No. 337, and present for decision the same propositions.

The court entered an order requiring appellant to answer questions to the following effect:

1st, whether he had personal knowledge of funds of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad used for political

Page 245 U. S. 48

campaign purposes in the State of Tennessee and charged on the books of the carrier to operating expenses or construction account, and second, whether he had personal knowledge of funds of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad used for campaign purposes in the State of Kentucky and charged on the books of the carrier to construction account or operating expenses.

It will be observed that the questions are limited, as some of the questions in No. 337 were, to the allocation upon the books of the company, of the funds expended, if any. They are within the reasoning of the opinion in No. 337 and, on the authority of that case, the order is

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial