Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Glass Vs. Woodman

Glass vs Woodman

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1916
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/92509

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
241 U.S. 646
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Glass

Respondent

Woodman

Excerpt

glass v. woodman - 241 u.s. 646 (1916) u.s. supreme court glass v. woodman , 241 u.s. 646 (1916) 241 u.s. 646 david h. glass, appellant, v. alfred h. woodman1 et al. no. 721. supreme court of the united states march 20, 1916 messrs. w. f. guthrie and emmet h. gamble for appellant. messrs. john s. leahy, walter h. saunders, and irvin v. barth for appellees. per curiam: dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) bagley v. general fire extinguisher co. 212 u.s. 477 , 53 l. ed. 605, 29 sup. ct. rep. 341; omaha electric light & p. co. v. omaha, 230 u.s. 123 , 57 l. ed. 1419, 33 sup. ct. rep. 974; st. anthony church v. pennsylvania r. co. 237 u.s. 575 -577, 59 l. ed. 1119-1123, 35 sup. ct. rep. 729; (2) st. louis, k. c. & c. r. co. v. wabash r. co. 217 u.s. 247, 250 , 54 s. l. ed. 752, 754, 30 sup. ct. rep. 510; railroad commission v. worthington, 225 u.s. 101, 104 , 56 s. l. ed. 1004, 1006, 32 sup. ct. rep. 653; shulthis v. mcdougal, 225 u.s. 561, 568 , 56 s. l. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 sup. ct. rep. 704. the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. footnotes footnote 1 death of alfred h. woodman suggested, and appearance of james p. newell, public administrator of the city of st. louis, and administrator of the estate of alfred h. woodman, deceased, filed and entered on march 13, 1916.[ glass v. woodman 241 u.s. 646 (1916) ]

Full Judgment

GLASS v. WOODMAN - 241 U.S. 646 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court GLASS v. WOODMAN , 241 U.S. 646 (1916)

241 U.S. 646

DAVID H. GLASS, Appellant,
v.
ALFRED H. WOODMAN1 et al.
No. 721.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 20, 1916

Messrs. W. F. Guthrie and Emmet H. Gamble for appellant.

Messrs. John S. Leahy, Walter H. Saunders, and Irvin V. Barth for appellees.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co. 212 U.S. 477 , 53 L. ed. 605, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341; Omaha Electric Light & P. Co. v. Omaha, 230 U.S. 123 , 57 L. ed. 1419, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 974; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 237 U.S. 575 -577, 59 L. ed. 1119-1123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 729; (2) St. Louis, K. C. & C. R. Co. v. Wabash R. Co. 217 U.S. 247, 250 , 54 S. L. ed. 752, 754, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510; Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 225 U.S. 101, 104 , 56 S. L. ed. 1004, 1006, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 568 , 56 S. L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704.

The petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied. Footnotes

Footnote 1 Death of Alfred H. Woodman suggested, and appearance of James P. Newell, public administrator of the city of St. Louis, and administrator of the estate of Alfred H. Woodman, deceased, filed and entered on March 13, 1916.[ Glass v. Woodman 241 U.S. 646 (1916) ]



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial