Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Purcell Vs. Quaker Realty Co.

Purcell vs Quaker Realty Co.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1916
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/92503

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
239 U.S. 635
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Purcell

Respondent

Quaker Realty Co.

Excerpt

purcell v. quaker realty co. - 239 u.s. 635 (1916) u.s. supreme court purcell v. quaker realty co., 239 u.s. 635 (1916) 70 s. ct. 283 239 u.s. 635 60 l. ed. 479 robert m. purcell et al., plaintiffs in error, v. quaker realty company, limited. no. 152. supreme court of the united states january 10, 1916 mr. e. howard mccaleb for plaintiffs in error. mr. william winans wall for defendants in error. per curiam: dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) castillo v. mcconnico, 168 u.s. 674 , 42 l. ed. 622, 18 sup. ct. rep. 229; de bearn v. safe deposit & t. co. 233 u.s. 24, 34 , 58 s. l. ed. 833, 837, 34 sup. ct. rep. 584; mcdonald v. oregon r. & nav. co. 233 u.s. 665, 669 , 670 s., 58 l. ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 sup. ct. rep. 772; (2) ross v. oregon, 227 u.s. 150, 161 , 57 s. l. ed. 458, 463, 33 sup. ct. rep. 220, ann. cas. 1914c, 224; moore-mansfield constr. co. v. electrical installation co. 234 u.s. 619, 624 , 58 s. l. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 sup. ct. rep. 941; willoughby v. chicago, cago, 235 u.s. 45 , 59 l. ed. 123, 35 sup. ct. rep. 23; cleveland & p. r. co. v. cleveland, 235 u.s. 50 , 59 l. ed. 127, 35 sup. ct. rep. 21.[ purcell v. quaker realty co. 239 u.s. 635 (1916) ]

Full Judgment

PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO. - 239 U.S. 635 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)

70 S. Ct. 283 239 U.S. 635 60 L. Ed. 479

ROBERT M. PURCELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
QUAKER REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 152.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 10, 1916

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674 , 42 L. ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34 , 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669 , 670 S., 58 L. ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161 , 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624 , 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45 , 59 L. ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50 , 59 L. ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial