A.Raja Kumari Vs. the Manager

A.Raja Kumari vs The Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 25, 2011

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/920159

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/920159
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: R.Sudhakar, J.
Decided On: Jul 25, 2011
Case Number: W.P.(MD)No.6258 of 2011
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Raja Kumari

Advocate Mr.P.Muthudurai, Adv.

Respondent

The Manager

Advocate Mr.R.Pandivel, Adv.

Excerpt

1. this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant educational loan to the petitioner. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent. by consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. the petitioner who is studying b.d.s degree at sri venkateswara dental college and hospital in thalambur, has made an application to the respondent - central bank of india for grant of educational loan in a sum of rs.15,00,000/- (rupees fifteen lakhs only). since the same was not considered properly, the writ petition has been filed. 4. mr.pandivel, learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that the application submitted by the petitioner is incomplete. furthermore, at the time when the matter is taken up by this court, as per the circular issued by the lead bank namely indian overseas bank, the petitioner's loan application will have to be considered by the indian overseas bank, pavoorchatram, tenkasi taluk, tirunelveli district. 5. in view of the above, the manager of the indian overseas bank, pavoorchatram, tenkasi taluk, tirunelveli district, is directed to issue an application for educational loan to the petitioner and on submitting the same along with a copy of this order, it shall be considered in accordance with the relevant guidelines for speedy release of the educational loan forthwith. 6. the writ petition is disposed of as above. no costs.

Full Judgment

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant educational loan to the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Counsel for the respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. The petitioner who is studying B.D.S Degree at Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital in Thalambur, has made an application to the respondent - Central Bank of India for grant of Educational Loan in a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only). Since the same was not considered properly, the writ petition has been filed.

4. Mr.Pandivel, learned Counsel for the respondent Bank submits that the application submitted by the petitioner is incomplete. Furthermore, at the time when the matter is taken up by this Court, as per the circular issued by the Lead Bank namely Indian Overseas Bank, the petitioner's loan application will have to be considered by the Indian Overseas Bank, Pavoorchatram, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

5. In view of the above, the Manager of the Indian Overseas Bank, Pavoorchatram, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District, is directed to issue an application for Educational Loan to the petitioner and on submitting the same along with a copy of this order, it shall be considered in accordance with the relevant guidelines for speedy release of the Educational Loan forthwith.

6. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2011 Same Parties A.Raja Kumari vs The Manager Same Subject MRTP Same Judge R.Sudhakar, J.