Raveendran Vs. State of Kkerala

Raveendran vs State of Kkerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 07, 2011

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/918062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/918062
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: V. Ramkumar, J.
Decided On: Mar 07, 2011
Case Number: Bail Appln.No.1618 of 2011
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 439; The Abkari Act - Sections 8(1), 8(2)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raveendran

Advocate SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR, Adv.

Respondent

State of Kkerala

Legal References

Acts: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 439; The Abkari Act - Sections 8(1), 8(2)
Reported In: ILR2011(1)Ker341

Excerpt

1. in this petition filed under section 439 cr.p.c. the petitioner who is the sole accused in crime no.9 of 2011 of noornadu excise range for an offence punishable under section 8(1) & (2) of the abkari act for having been found in possession of 2 litres of arrack, seeks his enlargement on bail. petitioner was arrested on 02/02/2011. 2. i heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor. 3. having regard to the nature of the offence, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., i am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 14/03/2011 on his executing a bond for `35,000/-(rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the judicial magistrate of the first class-ii, mavelikara and subject to the following conditions:- 1. petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all wednesdays till the filing of the final report. 2. the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report. 3. the petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. if the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. 4. this application is allowed as above. dated this the 7th day of march, 2011.

Full Judgment

1. In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.9 of 2011 of Noornadu Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 8(1) & (2) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 2 litres of arrack, seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 02/02/2011.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offence, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 14/03/2011 on his executing a bond for `35,000/-(Rupees thirty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Mavelikara and subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

4. This application is allowed as above. Dated this the 7th day of March, 2011.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2011 Same Parties Raveendran vs State of Kkerala Same Subject Criminal Same Judge V. Ramkumar, J. Acts & Sections Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 439; The...