.....act, 1954.because the hindu marriage act, 1955, had already come into force on 18-5-1955, and the marriage took place thereafter and it was
hit by provisions of section 17 of the hindu marriage act. the petitioner in her evidence has clearly stated that she did not remember as to when the marriage took place. -the petitioner has stated in the course . stated:
"respondent7 was retired by then". of the respondent. the petitioner in her evidence has stated that during the ceremony, the marriage rites were re-performed and that her husband (respondent) tied a 'tali' to her neck, sprinkled flowers on her and garlanded her. my sisters and their husbands, brothers and their wives, respondent's mother, paternal aunt, panduranga guru, respondent's brothers, and their wives, sisters and their family and other. all the ceremonies connected
to the marriage were observed. if fact, though the respondent in his evidence denied that he tied another tali to the petitioner, . ex. d_5 is the marriage certificate. the parties, it appears, laboured under some notion that there was some infirmity in their marriage, because the respondent had another wife smt. sharada bai at that time
under the special marriages act. that being so, the petitioner wife is entitled to restitution of conjugal
rights as contemplated under section 9 of the hindu marriage act, 1955.1. the petitioner, who is the accused in crime no.593 of 2010 of sreekaryam
police station, for an offence punishable under section 379 i.p.c., seeks his enlargement on bail. 2. the learned
public prosecutor on instructions submitted that no final report
has been filed even after 60 days of judicial custody of the petitioner. if so, by virtue of the proviso to
sec.167 (2) cr.p.c. the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail as of right. 3. accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for `50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the magistrate concerned and
subject to the following conditions:- 1. the petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all wednesdays. 2. the petitioner shall not enter the limits of sreekaryam
police station except for the purpose of complying with condition no.1. 3. the petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. the petitioner shall make him available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating officer. 5. the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. 4. if the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.