Full Judgment
2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that in the F.I.R. there is general allegation against all the accused persons but witness Amar Singh in his statement stated that co-accused Harish Chandra had fired shot which hit on the chest of the deceased. It is further contended that ante mortem injury no.3 has not been explained which is stab wound.
3. Learned Private Counsel for the complainant contended that there was motive on the part of the applicant and all the accused persons have fired shot and thereafter co-accuse
4. Learned A.G.A. has supported the same facts.
5. The main allegation is against the co-accused Harish Chandra and case of the applicant is distinguishable from the co-accused Harish Chandra. Applicant is in jail since 5.5.2010.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
7. Let the applicant Ramesh involved in Case Crime No. 776 of 2010, under Sections302 IPC Police Station Hasanpur District J.P. Nagar is released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.