Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Wealth Tax vs.atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd.
Delhi
Sep-21-2017
Direct Taxation
Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Mr. V.P. Gupta, Mr. Arunav Kumar
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WTA162005 Reserved on: September 12, 2017 Date of decision: September 21, 2017 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askh.t. Media Limited vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax-Iv, New Del ...
Delhi
Aug-23-2017
Direct Taxation
Mr. Ajay Vohra, Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Mr. Rajesh ITA No, Mr. V.P. Gupta, Mr. Arunav Kumar, Mr. Rajesh Manchanda
$~ * + H.T. MEDIA LIMITED IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.548/2015 Reserved on:1. t August, 2017 Decided on:23. d August, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Gkn Driveline India Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi
Nov-27-2017
Direct Taxation
Mr. V. P. Gupta, Mr. Anunav Kumar
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA5422005 Reserved on :16. h November, 2017 Date of decision :27. h November, 2017 M/S. GKN DRIVELINE INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Syed Muzaffar Ali and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Nov-30-1992
Civil
1995Supp(4)SCC426
M.N. Venkatachaliah and; A.S. Anand, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel on both sides2. It is urged on behalf of the petitioners that the structural changes brought about by the petitioners in respect of the building...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ganga Corporation Asbestos (P.) Ltd.
Allahabad
Apr-23-2014
Direct Taxation
Sri. RK Upadhayay
Rajes Kumar, J. 1. Heard Sri RK Upadhayay, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Sri Ashish Bansal appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. This is an appeal under section 260 (A) of the Income Tax Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Steels Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Mar-14-1997
Direct Taxation
(1997)62ITD233(Pune.)
1. These two appeals by the assessee for the asst. yrs. 1991-92 and 1992-93 are combined for the sake of convenience.2. The assessee is a public limited company and is engaged in the production of steel....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Steels Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Mar-14-1997
Direct Taxation
(1997)59TTJ(Pune.)316
These two appeals by the assessee for the asst. yrs. 1991-92 and 1992-93 are combined for the sake of convenience.2. The assessee is a public limited company and is engaged in the production of steel. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH. P. State Small Industries and Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Jan-28-2000
Direct Taxation
1. The following ground is raised in this appeal directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) : "That in the facts and circumstances of the case the learned CIT(A) is not justified in sustaining the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Aggarwal Vs. State and anr.
Delhi
Jan-24-2006
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 to 141(1)(2), 142, 143(3), 254 and 260 to 264; Amendment Act 2002; Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 211, 340, 406 and 420; Company Law; Instruments Laws
2006(1)ALD(Cri)55; (2006)143PLR7
Ms. C.M. Chopra and; Ms. Rakhi Nigam, Advs
J.P. Singh, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the summoning order dated 27.7.1999 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act passed by Metropolitan Magistrate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Ram Murti Devi and ors. Vs. Ralla Ram Tulsi Ram and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Aug-19-1985
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 42, 42(4), 52 and 146 - Order 21, Rules 10 and 16 - Order 22, Rules 3, 4, 8 and 12; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Section 214 and 214(1)
AIR1987HP1
K.D. Sood, Adv.
ORDERV.P. Gupta, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved from the order dated July 12, 1982, passed by the Senior Sub-Judge Shimla, the petitioners have filed the present revision petition. 2. Briefly, the facts are that a money decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »