Kenyon Vs. Fowler

Kenyon vs Fowler

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1910

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90973

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/90973
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1910
Case Number: 215 U.S. 593
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kenyon

Respondent

Fowler

Excerpt

kenyon v. fowler - 215 u.s. 593 (1910) u.s. supreme court kenyon v. fowler, 215 u.s. 593 (1910) 215 u.s. 593 otis w. kenyon, plaintiff in error, v. albert p. fowler, as receiver of the american exchange national bank of syracuse. no. 87. supreme court of the united states january 24, 1910 mr. dorr raymond cobb for plaintiff in error. mr. leonard c. crouch for defendant in error. per curiam: judgment affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the circuit court of the united states for the northern district of new york. keyser v. hitz, 133 u.s. 138 , 33 l. ed. 531, 10 sup. ct. rep. 290; finn v. brown, 142 u.s. 56 , 35 l. ed. 936, 12 sup. ct. rep. 136; richmond v. irons, 121 u.s. 27 30 l. ed. 864, 7 sup. ct. rep. 788; matteson v. dent, 176 u.s. 521 , 44 l. ed. 571, 20 sup. ct. rep. 419.

Full Judgment

KENYON v. FOWLER - 215 U.S. 593 (1910)
U.S. Supreme Court KENYON v. FOWLER, 215 U.S. 593 (1910)

215 U.S. 593

OTIS W. KENYON, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
ALBERT P. FOWLER, as receiver of the American Exchange National Bank of Syracuse.
No. 87.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 24, 1910

Mr. Dorr Raymond Cobb for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Leonard C. Crouch for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Keyser v. Hitz, 133 U.S. 138 , 33 L. ed. 531, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 290; Finn v. Brown, 142 U.S. 56 , 35 L. ed. 936, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136; Richmond v. Irons, 121 U.S. 27 30 L. ed. 864, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 788; Matteson v. Dent, 176 U.S. 521 , 44 L. ed. 571, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419.

Same Parties Kenyon vs Fowler Same Subject MRTP