The Union of India and anr. Vs. Sri Tapan Kumar Roy

The Union of India and anr. vs Sri Tapan Kumar Roy

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Aug 19, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/906231

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/906231
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: I . P. Mukerji, J.
Decided On: Aug 19, 2010
Case Number: AP No. 293 of 2010
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Union of India and anr.

Advocate Mr. Subrata Talukder, Adv.

Respondent

Sri Tapan Kumar Roy

Advocate Mr. Dipak Basu, Sr. Adv.

Excerpt

the court :- this application is admitted by condoning delay, as in my opinion sufficient cause has been shown. it appears that claim nos. 1, 2 and 3 were awarded in their entirety to the respondent on the basis of admission made by the railways. such portion of the award has not even been challenged in this application. therefore, i give liberty to the award-holder/respondent to proceed with execution in respect of the above portion of the award, if the railways do not pay the said awarded sum, (without interest) within one month from the date of communication of this order. the petitioner may proceed with the application, subject to the above condition. list this application after the long vacation. urgent certified photocopies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

Full Judgment

The Court :- This application is admitted by condoning delay, as in my opinion sufficient cause has been shown. It appears that claim nos. 1, 2 and 3 were awarded in their entirety to the respondent on the basis of admission made by the railways. Such portion of the award has not even been challenged in this application.

Therefore, I give liberty to the award-holder/respondent to proceed with execution in respect of the above portion of the award, if the railways do not pay the said awarded sum, (without interest) within one month from the date of communication of this order. The petitioner may proceed with the application, subject to the above condition.

List this application after the long vacation. Urgent certified photocopies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2010 Same Parties The Union of India and anr. vs Sri Tapan Kumar Roy Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge I . P. Mukerji, J.

Land Acquisition sufficient cause In respect of Long vacation Subject to Has been in re