Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Silicon Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sikria Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.

Silicon Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs Sikria Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Nov 10, 2010
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/906078

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
T No. 76 of 2010
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Silicon Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Advocate Mr. S.K.Kapur, Sr. ; Mr. S.N.Mitra, Sr. ; Mr. S.Dutta, ; Ms. S.Sanyal, Advs.

Respondent

Sikria Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.

Excerpt

.....and without sharing the profits with the petitioner in terms of the agreement. protective orders were passed by indira banerjee, j., in an earlier section 9 application appointing a receiver and directing utilisation of funds under the receiver, though the respondent was allowed to receive such funds. it is submitted that such order is being circumvented. therefore, as a further interim order, i direct the appointed receiver, mr. dhirendra nath sharma, advocate, to open a separate bank account immediately. for the time being, i direct engineering projects (india) ltd. to remit all sums payable under the contract to the respoondent to mr. dhirendra nath sharma, receiver, and not to the petitioner. the receiver will receive and retain such money in that account, subject to further orders to be passed by this court. the petitioner will pay him ad hoc remuneration of 1000 gms. let a copy of this application be served on engineering projects (india) ltd. as well. i make this application returnable on 12th november, 2010, as new motion. receiver and all parties concerned are to act on a signed photocopy of this order upon the usual undertakings.

Full Judgment

The Court : This is a third Section 9 application, moved ex parte. It is so moved on the apprehension that if notice of this application was given to the respondent, they would quickly realise the sum payable to them by Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. and misappropriate it.

The prima facie case of the petitioner is like this. The respondent obtained a contract from a Government company, Engineering Projects (India) Ltd., to construct a jail in Tripura. The petitioner became its business partner to execute such project. Such project became a joint venture between the petitioner and the respondent. The petitioner provided the respondent with substantial capital.

The respondent has committed breach of the joint venture agreement and is, inter alia, utilising the funds received from Engineering Projects (India) Ltd., keeping the petitioner in the dark and without sharing the profits with the petitioner in terms of the agreement. Protective orders were passed by Indira Banerjee, J., in an earlier Section 9 application appointing a Receiver and directing utilisation of funds under the Receiver, though the respondent was allowed to receive such funds.

It is submitted that such order is being circumvented. Therefore, as a further interim order, I direct the appointed Receiver, Mr. Dhirendra Nath Sharma, Advocate, to open a separate bank account immediately. For the time being, I direct Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. to remit all sums payable under the contract to the respoondent to Mr. Dhirendra Nath Sharma, Receiver, and not to the petitioner.

The Receiver will receive and retain such money in that account, subject to further orders to be passed by this Court. The petitioner will pay him ad hoc remuneration of 1000 GMs. Let a copy of this application be served on Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. as well. I make this application returnable on 12th November, 2010, as New Motion.

Receiver and all parties concerned are to act on a signed photocopy of this order upon the usual undertakings.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial