Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sreekumar S. Vs. State of Kerala, (Special Tahsildar) and the Managing Director

Sreekumar S. vs State of Kerala, (Special Tahsildar) and the Managing Director

Disposition Application allowed Court Kerala Decided Jun 17, 2010
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/903544

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.M. Appln. 766/2010 in L.A.A. No. 486 of 2010
Subject
Property
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Property
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sreekumar S.

Advocate Gopakumar R. Thaliyal, Adv.

Respondent

State of Kerala, (Special Tahsildar) and the Managing Director

Advocate No Appearance

Excerpt

- order4. this application seeking condonation of the delay of 1313 days is very stiffly opposed by the learned senior government pleader. however, on the consideration that causes should be allowed to be adjudicated as far as possible on their merits rather than decided on technicalities, we are inclined to condone the delay imposing conditions.5. this application will stand allowed subject to the following conditions:i). the appellant shall pay a sum of rs. 3500/- (rupees three thousand five hundred only) as cost to the government through the office of the advocate general within two weeks from today and produce receipt before this court.ii). the appellant shall pay a further amount of rs. 2,500/- (rupees two thousand five hundred only) to the high court legal services committee within the same time limit and produce receipt before this court.iii). in the event of the appeal being allowed and the appellant becoming eligible for enhanced compensation, such enhanced compensation will not carry interest otherwise admissible under section 28 of the act during the period of 1313 days condoned by this order.annex a copy of this order to the judgment to be passed in the appeal.upon noticing receipt against the payment of amounts as directed above, the registry will number the appeal and send up the same for admission.

Full Judgment

ORDER

4. This application seeking condonation of the delay of 1313 days is very stiffly opposed by the learned senior Government Pleader. However, on the consideration that causes should be allowed to be adjudicated as far as possible on their merits rather than decided on technicalities, we are inclined to condone the delay imposing conditions.

5. This application will stand allowed subject to the following conditions:

i). The appellant shall pay a sum of Rs. 3500/- (Rupees Three Thousand Five Hundred only) as cost to the Government through the office of the Advocate General within two weeks from today and produce receipt before this court.

ii). The appellant shall pay a further amount of Rs. 2,500/- (Rupees Two Thousand Five Hundred only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee within the same time limit and produce receipt before this court.

iii). In the event of the appeal being allowed and the appellant becoming eligible for enhanced compensation, such enhanced compensation will not carry interest otherwise admissible under Section 28 of the Act during the period of 1313 days condoned by this order.

Annex a copy of this order to the judgment to be passed in the appeal.

Upon noticing receipt against the payment of amounts as directed above, the Registry will number the appeal and send up the same for admission.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial