Full Judgment
Richard Garth, C.J.
1. It appears tome that Mr. Belchambers is perfectly right, and that the value of the property must be the value at the present time, less the capitalized value of the annuity.
In Re: Rushton (Deceased)
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/874063
- Court
- Kolkata
- Judge
- Richard Garth, C.J.
- Decided On
- Apr 29, 1878
- Subject
- Property
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
Probate - Ad valorem Fee--Annuity charged upon Property of Testator--Court Fees Act (Act VII of 1870), Schedule i, Clause 11. -
- Key legal issue
- Property
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
In Re: Rushton (Deceased)
Legal References
- Reported In
- (1878)ILR3Cal736
Excerpt
probate - ad valorem fee--annuity charged upon property of testator--court fees act (act vii of 1870), schedule i, clause 11. - richard garth, c.j.1. it appears tome that mr. belchambers is perfectly right, and that the value of the property must be the value at the present time, less the capitalized value of the annuity.