Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Abdool Aziz

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 15, 1896
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/862528

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Practice - Probate--Immoveable property--The Court Fees Act (Act VII of 1870), Schedule I, No. 11. -

Key legal issue
Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Abdool Aziz

Legal References

Reported In
(1896)ILR23Cal577

Excerpt

practice - probate--immoveable property--the court fees act (act vii of 1870), schedule i, no. 11. - ameer ali and sale, jj.1. it appears that the house respecting which the question as to payment of probate duty has arisen forms the subject-matter of a suit, which was instituted by the testator with the object of obtaining possession thereof, but during the pendency of which he died. he has left a will, by which he gives the property to the petitioner who is named as executor. the executor has applied for probate, stating that the testator has left no other assets, and prays that he may be exempted from the payment of probate duty, until after the decision of the suit in his favour. the testator had a mere right of action in respect of the house, which he was seeking to enforce. the value of such a right it is, of course, impossible to determine. that right he devised to the applicant.2. as this is a case unprovided for under the act, we may fairly take the value of the property for the purposes of the present application as not exceeding rs. 1,000.

Full Judgment

Ameer Ali and Sale, JJ.

1. It appears that the house respecting which the question as to payment of probate duty has arisen forms the subject-matter of a suit, which was instituted by the testator with the object of obtaining possession thereof, but during the pendency of which he died. He has left a will, by which he gives the property to the petitioner who is named as executor. The executor has applied for probate, stating that the testator has left no other assets, and prays that he may be exempted from the payment of probate duty, until after the decision of the suit in his favour. The testator had a mere right of action in respect of the house, which he was seeking to enforce. The value of such a right it is, of course, impossible to determine. That right he devised to the applicant.

2. As this is a case unprovided for under the Act, we may fairly take the value of the property for the purposes of the present application as not exceeding Rs. 1,000.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial