Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Atri Bai Vs. Arnopoorna Bai

Atri Bai vs Arnopoorna Bai

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 28, 1883
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/858366

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition Act (X of 1870, Sections 15 and 39) - Appeal--Second Appeal--High Court, Appeal to. -

Key legal issue
Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Atri Bai

Respondent

Arnopoorna Bai

Legal References

Reported In
(1883)ILR9Cal838

Excerpt

land acquisition act (x of 1870, sections 15 and 39) - appeal--second appeal--high court, appeal to. - prinsep, j.1. a preliminary objection has been raised to the hearing of this appeal that the law (section 39 of the land acquisition act of 1870) does not provide for a second appeal; and that only certain provisions of the code of civil procedure, among which the chapter relating to appeals is not to be found, are extended to proceedings under that act, the case falls under part iv of the land acquisition act, and relates to the apportionment of the compensation awarded. the limitation of the application of the code applies only to part vii. further it appears to us from the very nature of the dispute between the parties that these proceedings must be regarded as a suit. in the next place section 39 declares that in cases like the present case 'the appeal shall lie in the first instance to the district judge,' from which it would seem that a further appeal was contemplated by the legislature. in any case, however, having regard to the nature of the proceedings and the powers conferred on us by law in suits, we should not be inclined to limit our jurisdiction without any express words in any law to that effect.2. on the merits of the case there is no reason to question the correctness of the conclusion arrived at by the lower appellate court.3. the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Full Judgment

Prinsep, J.

1. A preliminary objection has been raised to the hearing of this appeal that the law (Section 39 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1870) does not provide for a second appeal; and that only certain provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, among which the chapter relating to appeals is not to be found, are extended to proceedings under that Act, The case falls under Part IV of the Land Acquisition Act, and relates to the apportionment of the compensation awarded. The limitation of the application of the Code applies only to Part VII. Further it appears to us from the very nature of the dispute between the parties that these proceedings must be regarded as a suit. In the next place Section 39 declares that in cases like the present case 'the appeal shall lie in the first instance to the District Judge,' from which it would seem that a further appeal was contemplated by the Legislature. In any case, however, having regard to the nature of the proceedings and the powers conferred on us by law in suits, we should not be inclined to limit our jurisdiction without any express words in any law to that effect.

2. On the merits of the case there is no reason to question the correctness of the conclusion arrived at by the lower Appellate Court.

3. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial