Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Lalla Gopee Chand and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Dec 15, 1876
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/857721

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Privy Council Appeals - Act (VI of 1874), Sections 8 and 11, Clause b--Limitation Act (IX of 1871), Section 5--Practice--Closing of the Court--Deposit of money under Clause 6, Section 11, Act VI of 1874--Power of the Court to grant special permission. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Lalla Gopee Chand and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
(1877)ILR2Cal128

Excerpt

privy council appeals - act (vi of 1874), sections 8 and 11, clause b--limitation act (ix of 1871), section 5--practice--closing of the court--deposit of money under clause 6, section 11, act vi of 1874--power of the court to grant special permission. - markby, j.1. in my opinion the officer was right in declining to receive the deposit. the applicant claims the benefit of section 8 of act vi of 1874 and section 5 of act ix of 1871, the 16th of november being the day on which the court re-opened in the sense that that was the day upon which the benches sat as usual for the first time. but those sections only apply to suits, appeals, and applications. no application was necessary in this case; the money is merely, brought to the officer of the court, who receives it making the usual entries, and this could have been done on any day after the 23rd of october.2. i have enquired as to the practice, and i find that it has always been usual, when the last day falls during the period when the offices are closed, for the money to be brought in before the holidays commence.3. i am also asked to give permission that the money be deposited now. i do not think i have power to do that.

Full Judgment

Markby, J.

1. In my opinion the officer was right in declining to receive the deposit. The applicant claims the benefit of Section 8 of Act VI of 1874 and Section 5 of Act IX of 1871, the 16th of November being the day on which the Court re-opened in the sense that that was the day upon which the Benches sat as usual for the first time. But those sections only apply to suits, appeals, and applications. No application was necessary in this case; the money is merely, brought to the officer of the Court, who receives it making the usual entries, and this could have been done on any day after the 23rd of October.

2. I have enquired as to the practice, and I find that it has always been usual, when the last day falls during the period when the offices are closed, for the money to be brought in before the holidays commence.

3. I am also asked to give permission that the money be deposited now. I do not think I have power to do that.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial