Advanced Search Results
Ram Chunder Ghosaul Vs. Juggutmenmohiney Dabee
Kolkata
Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Markby, J.
Aug-16-1878
Limitation
(1879)ILR4Cal283
Richard Garth, Kt., C.J.1. This case comes before us under circumstances which naturally give rise to much suspicion and distrust, and which should induce us, in my opinion, to make every reasonable presumption in the defendant's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManick Chunder Dutt Vs. Bhuggobutty Dossee
Kolkata
Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Markby, J.
Feb-11-1878
FamilyProperty
Markby, J.1. In this case the plaintiff, appellant, claims to have been adopted by the late Rajkrishna Dutt in his lifetime, and he brings this suit to have it declared that this adoption is valid, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Lalla Gopee Chand and ors.
Kolkata
Markby, J.
Dec-15-1876
Civil
(1877)ILR2Cal128
Markby, J.1. In my opinion the officer was right in declining to receive the deposit. The applicant claims the benefit of Section 8 of Act VI of 1874 and Section 5 of Act IX of 1871,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Miller Vs. the Administrator-general of Bengal
Kolkata
Markby, J.
Jul-01-1876
Family
(1876)ILR1Cal412
Markby, J.1. It is admitted between the parties that the Official Assignee as such Assignee is entitled to half of the said fund.2. The argument before me has turned entirely upon the construction of the Succession...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Feda HosseIn and ors.
Kolkata
Markby, J.
Jul-16-1876
Civil
(1876)ILR1Cal432
Markby, J.1. This, it will be observed, is not an application in the form required by Act VI of 1874, and it has been stated that the petition was so drawn expressly in order to raise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFuckhrunnissa Begum Vs. Ebrahim and anr.
Kolkata
Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Markby, J.
Aug-17-1878
Civil
(1879)ILR4Cal531
Richard Garth, C.J.1. I consider that in this case the appeal ought not to be heard. The decision of the learned Judge, which is appealed against, is not a judgment or decree which determines or affects...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPurnanund Asrum Vs. Rookinee Gooptani
Kolkata
Markby, J.
Aug-29-1878
Civil
(1879)ILR4Cal793
Markby, J.1. It appears to me that the judgment of Mr. Justice Ainslie was right. The plaintiff, who was an auction-purchaser, and claimed the privileges of Section 37 of Act XI of 1859, sued, not to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFleming Vs. Koegler
Kolkata
Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Markby, J.
Jul-24-1878
Contract
(1879)ILR4Cal237
Richard Garth, C.J.1. I think that the learned Judge in the Court below has arrived at a just conclusion in this case.2. The suit was brought by the plaintiffs, Messrs. Nicol, Fleming & Co., for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKherodemoney Dossee Vs. Doorgamoney Dossee and ors.
Kolkata
Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Markby, J.
Aug-17-1878
FamilyProperty
(1879)ILR4Cal456
Richard Garth, C.J.1. During the argument of this case, I confess I entertained some doubt upon both the questions involved in it; but after hearing a very able argument, for which I desire to thank the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHemendro Coomar Mullick Son of Rooplall Mullick Vs. Rajendrolall Moons ...
Kolkata
Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Markby, J.
Feb-11-1878
Contract
(1878)ILR3Cal354
Richard Garth, C.J.1. This suit was brought against the defendants to recover the amount of a promissory note, which was alleged to have been made by them jointly with one Gourhurry Shaw. It appeared from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »