Full Judgment
Wilson, J.
1. I cannot make an order as regards the defendant Joseph Polycarp, as he has not been served or entered appearance, but the order may run that the Receiver do convey, on behalf of all parties other than Joseph Polycarp.
Lackersteen and ors. Vs. Rostan and ors.
Lackersteen and ors. vs Rostan and ors.
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/857211
- Court
- Kolkata
- Judge
- Wilson, J.
- Decided On
- Apr 25, 1881
- Subject
- Property
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
Trustee Act (XXVII of 1866), Sections 2, 19, 20 and 32 - Appointment of Person to convey Property on behalf of Persons out of the Jurisdiction and under other Disabilities. -
- Key legal issue
- Property
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
Lackersteen and ors.
Respondent
Rostan and ors.
Legal References
- Reported In
- (1881)ILR7Cal32
Excerpt
trustee act (xxvii of 1866), sections 2, 19, 20 and 32 - appointment of person to convey property on behalf of persons out of the jurisdiction and under other disabilities. - wilson, j.1. i cannot make an order as regards the defendant joseph polycarp, as he has not been served or entered appearance, but the order may run that the receiver do convey, on behalf of all parties other than joseph polycarp.