Hyder Ali Vs. Jafar Ali

Hyder Ali vs Jafar Ali

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 15, 1875

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/853849

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/853849
Court: Kolkata
Judge: Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Macpherson, J.
Decided On: Jul 15, 1875
Subject: Tenancy

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Bengal Act VIII of 1869, Section 98 - Suit for value of Crops--Distraint--jurisdiction-Small Cause Court. -

Key legal issue: Tenancy

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hyder Ali

Respondent

Jafar Ali

Legal References

Reported In: (1876)ILR1Cal183

Excerpt

bengal act viii of 1869, section 98 - suit for value of crops--distraint--jurisdiction-small cause court. - richard garth, c.j.1. the judge of the small cause court is right in thinking that the small cause court has no jurisdiction, as the suit is clearly one which might and ought to have been brought under section 98 of bengal act viii of 1869.

Full Judgment

Richard Garth, C.J.

1. The Judge of the Small Cause Court is right in thinking that the Small Cause Court has no jurisdiction, as the suit is clearly one which might and ought to have been brought under Section 98 of Bengal Act VIII of 1869.

Same Parties Hyder Ali vs Jafar Ali Same Subject Tenancy Same Judge Richard Garth, C.J. and ;Macpherson, J.

Tenancy