Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amolia Vs. in Re: Ibrahim Ishak

Amolia vs In Re: Ibrahim Ishak

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 04, 1919
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/852102

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Tenancy;Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Stamp Duty - Lease--Monthly tenancy--Stamp Act (II of 1899), Section 61(1) and Schedule I, Articles 15, 35(a)(1). -

Key legal issue
Tenancy;Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amolia

Respondent

In Re: Ibrahim Ishak

Legal References

Reported In
(1919)ILR46Cal804

Excerpt

stamp duty - lease--monthly tenancy--stamp act (ii of 1899), section 61(1) and schedule i, articles 15, 35(a)(1). - sanderson, c.j.1. in this case learned counsel has conceded--and i think rightly--that the tenancy was a monthly tenancy and, consequently, it comes within article 35, clause (a), sub-clause (1) of the first schedule of the indian stamp act: that is to say, 'the lease purports to be for a term of less than one year' therefore, the proper stamp-duty is the same duty as for a bond which is referred to in article 15; and, inasmuch as the amount is above rs. 50 and does not exceed is. 100, the proper stamp-duty is eight annas, as the learned judge has decided.woodroffe, j.2. i agree.

Full Judgment

Sanderson, C.J.

1. In this case learned Counsel has conceded--and I think rightly--that the tenancy was a monthly tenancy and, consequently, it comes within Article 35, Clause (a), Sub-clause (1) of the first Schedule of the Indian Stamp Act: that is to say, 'the lease purports to be for a term of less than one year' Therefore, the proper stamp-duty is the same duty as for a bond which is referred to in Article 15; and, inasmuch as the amount is above Rs. 50 and does not exceed is. 100, the proper stamp-duty is eight annas, as the learned Judge has decided.

Woodroffe, J.

2. I agree.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial