Advanced Search Results

S.B. Khanna Vs. Triloknathtrehan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi557

v. Gian Chand, : [1968]1SCR536 , and Kanwar Behari v. Smt. Vindhya Devi, . The finding of the civil cout that the entire second floor including the open roof was within the tenancy operated as rest judicafa … is the landlord. The tenanted premises are in the second floor of the house. The landlord terminated the tenancy by a notice dated February 18, 1976. He made the eviction application on April 6, 1976. In the

Mt. Ananti Vs. Chhannu and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1930All193; ILR(1929)All501

as a trespasser, for possession and compensation regarding a holding or a part thereof, and the defendant pleads tenancy, then having regard to Sections 99 and 230 of the Act (3 of 1926), is the suit maintainable … difficulty was that if the allegations in the plaint were accepted the suit would be cognizable by the civil Court, but if the defence, as mentioned in their written statement, could be considered without an inquiry as

Bapu Sitaram Adsule Vs. Appa Mhadgonda Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR265; 1974MhLJ497

Judge, Junior Division, Jaysingpur, in Regular Civil Suit No. 66 of 1961 referring the issue as to the tenancy of the respondents in the suit land to the Tahsildar, Shirol.2. The dispute in this suit relates to

Vishwa Nath Prasad Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 - Sections 9; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 7; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 147, 162, 243 and 251; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1980All7

under Sec. 9 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, alleging that the plot in question was tenancy grove of Har Pd. and Ganesh Pd. The erstwhile Zamindar filed a suit for recovery of arrears of … and all proceedings in connection therewith are to be governed by the provisions contained in the Code of Civil Procedure. It, therefore, follows that the decree obtained in the suit for recovery of arrears of rent was

Vasant Pratap Pandit Vs. Dr Anant Trimbak Sabnis

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11) and 15(1)

Reported in : (1994)96BOMLR963; JT1994(3)SC267; 1994(2)SCALE541; (1994)3SCC481; [1994]3SCR451; 1994(2)LC273(SC)

the respondent to vacate the premises and on his refusal instituted a suit for eviction in the City Civil Court, Bombay. The respondent resisted the suit principally on the ground, that the bequest of the tenancy rights … for consideration in these two appeals, preferred against the judgments of the High Court of Bombay, is whether tenancy rights under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the

Rohitkumar Bhavanishanker Dave and ors. Vs. Jayshanker Chhotashanker D ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 70(6) and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 14, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1694

order at page 43 that the petitioner has failed to prove that he is the tenant under the Tenancy Act amounts to virtually allowing the suit against the present petitioner. He also submitted that on one hand, … the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 5th July, 2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge, J.D., Savli below Exh. 26 in R.C.S. No. 48 of 1988. It was submitted by the learned

Galib BIn Awaz Vs. Mohd. Abdul Khader and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property, 1952 - Sections 8 and 9; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 2(2), 34, 37, 37-A, 40, 99 and 102

Reported in : AIR1987SC1565; JT1987(2)SC628; 1987(1)SCALE1262; (1987)3SCC527; [1987]2SCR1229; 1987(2)LC377(SC)

case relates to the question whether Abdul Khader was 'a protected tenant' under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 being Act No. XXI of 1950 (hereinafter called the Andhra Pradesh Act). The … of the Act. It is as follows:99. Bar of Jurisdiction:- (1) Save as provided in this Act no Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to settle, decide or deal with any question which is by or under this

Patel Gordhanbhai Vagjibhai and ors. Vs. Vaghri Ranchhodbhai Semtabhai ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(18), 4, 14, 31, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 32, 32A, 32B, 32C, 32D, 32E, 32F, 32G, 32H, 32I, 32J, 32K, 32L, 32M, 32N, 32O, 32P, 32Q, 32R, 34, 43-C, 70, 85, 85-A, 89 and 89(2); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 46; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 88 and 88(1); Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906; ;Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; Bombay Municipal Boroughts Act, 1925; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 7; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939

Reported in : AIR1966Guj253; (1966)0GLR311

1. This petition raises the question of interpretation of the proviso to Section 43C, inserted in the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. 1948 by Amending Act 13 of 1966 and its effect upon the jurisdiction of … Agricultural Lands Act. 1948 by Amending Act 13 of 1966 and its effect upon the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in which the petitioners and their deceased brother Ambalal had tiled a suit for a decree for

Rajasthan Housing Board Vs. New Pink City Nirman Sahka.Sam.Ld. and Anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

raised by the Housing Board with respect to the entitlement of Society under section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, was brushed aside. On appeal to the High Court, the single Bench vide impugned judgment and order … Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1527-1536 OF2013Rajasthan Housing Board ... Appellant Vs - New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti

Jaypal Bandu Adake and anr. Vs. Basavali Gurulingappa Mhalank and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(3), 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3)

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR485; 1982MhLJ512

Matched in: Advocate Ajit P. Shah and ;M.D. Gangakhedkar, Advs. in Special Civil Application No. 1812 of 1977, ; S.M. Dange, Adv. for ;M.V. Sali, Adv. in Special Civil Application No. 1866 of 1977 B.P. Apte, Adv. for respondent No. 1 in Special Civil Application No. 1812 of 1977, ;V.P. Tipnis, Adv. for respondent No. 1 in Special Civil Application No. 1866 of 1977