Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Reliance Venture Ltd. Vs. O.D. Properties P. Ltd. and ors.

Reliance Venture Ltd. vs O.D. Properties P. Ltd. and ors.

Disposition Application allowed Court Supreme Court of India Decided Dec 03, 2008
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/841826

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Transfer Petition (C) No. 406 of 2008
Subject
Civil
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- INDIAN ELECTRICITY ACT, 1910 Section 9-A: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph , JJ ] Theft of Electricity - Offence by Company -Vicarious liability - Prosecution of directors of company - Held, It is obligatory on the part of the complainant not only to make requisite averments in the complaint petition but also to...

Key legal issue
Civil
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed
Acts & sections
Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 139A(1)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Reliance Venture Ltd.

Advocate Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.,; K.R. Sasiprabhu and; R. Chan

Respondent

O.D. Properties P. Ltd. and ors.

Advocate Ravindra Bana, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 139A(1)
Cases Referred
(Megnath Nathuram Patil and Ors. v. The Development Commissioner and Ors.

Excerpt

- indian electricity act, 1910 section 9-a: [s.b. sinha & cyriac joseph , jj ] theft of electricity - offence by company -vicarious liability - prosecution of directors of company - held, it is obligatory on the part of the complainant not only to make requisite averments in the complaint petition but also to prove that any of the directors who had been prosecuted for alleged commission of the aforementioned offence was in charge of and was otherwise responsible for the conduct of the affairs of the company. as the complainant /electricity board failed to prove this fact, conviction was set aside order1. by the present petition in this court under article 139a(1) of the constitution of india, the petitioners are seeking transfer of civil writ petition no. 4417 of 2006 (o.d. properties pvt. ltd. and anr. v. state of haryana and ors.) now pending before the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh to this court on the ground that on similar issues, namely, writ petition (c) no. 537 of 2006 (kuldeep singh bishnoi v. union of india and ors.) is pending decision before this court under article 32 of the constitution of india. it also appears that on similar issues, a bench of this court on 21st of october, 2008 have already transferred w.p. (c) no. 8814 of 2007 (gram panchayat gharauli khurd and ors. v. union of india and ors.), writ petition no. 14049 of 2006 (ajay singh chautala and anr. v. union of india and ors.) and writ petition no. 10704 of 2007 (jagdish kumar wadhwa v. state of haryana and ors.) to this court which were pending in the high court of punjab and haryana. similarly, another pil writ petition no. 74 of 2007 (megnath nathuram patil and ors. v. the development commissioner and ors.) which was also pending in the high court of bombay has already been transferred to this court for final adjudication by the aforesaid order of a bench of this court passed on 21st of october, 2008.2. considering the above order of this court and considering that similar issues are to be decided in this matter, the case being w.p. (c) no. 4417 of 2006 now pending before the high court of punjab & haryana at chandigarh should also be transferred to this court. accordingly, the application for transfer is allowed and the abovementioned writ petition (c) 4417 of 2006 stands transferred to this court.3. list all the writ petitions for directions in the second week of january, 2009. in the meantime, counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed within four weeks. rejoinder to be filed within two weeks thereafter.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. By the present petition in this Court under Article 139A(1) of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are seeking transfer of Civil Writ Petition No. 4417 of 2006 (O.D. Properties Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.) now pending before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh to this Court on the ground that on similar issues, namely, Writ Petition (C) No. 537 of 2006 (Kuldeep Singh Bishnoi v. Union of India and Ors.) is pending decision before this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. It also appears that on similar issues, a Bench of this Court on 21st of October, 2008 have already transferred W.P. (C) No. 8814 of 2007 (Gram Panchayat Gharauli Khurd and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.), Writ Petition No. 14049 of 2006 (Ajay Singh Chautala and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.) and Writ Petition No. 10704 of 2007 (Jagdish Kumar Wadhwa v. State of Haryana and Ors.) to this Court which were pending in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Similarly, another PIL Writ Petition No. 74 of 2007 (Megnath Nathuram Patil and Ors. v. The Development Commissioner and Ors.) which was also pending in the High Court of Bombay has already been transferred to this Court for final adjudication by the aforesaid order of a Bench of this Court passed on 21st of October, 2008.

2. Considering the above order of this Court and considering that similar issues are to be decided in this matter, the case being W.P. (C) No. 4417 of 2006 now pending before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh should also be transferred to this Court. Accordingly, the application for transfer is allowed and the abovementioned Writ Petition (C) 4417 of 2006 stands transferred to this Court.

3. List all the Writ Petitions for directions in the second week of January, 2009. In the meantime, counter affidavit, if any, shall be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder to be filed within two weeks thereafter.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial