Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: harish n salve · Page 1 of about 465 results (0.105 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 28 2008

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-2008

Subject : Environment

Reported in : JT2008(7)SC210; (2008)5MLJ604(SC); 2008(6)SCALE499; (2008)7SCC126; 2008(7)SCC133; 2008AIRSCW3877

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Vahanvati, S.G., ;A. Sharan, ASG, ;Harish N. Salve, ;Uday U Lalit, ;T.S. Doabia, ;Ranjit Kumar, ;K.K. Venugopal, ;Mukul Rohtagi, ;P.S. Patwalia, ;Altaf Ahmed, ;V.A. Mohta, ;S.B. Upadhyay, ;Ranjit

ORDER1. It is an undisputed fact that the forest in this country is an important and vital component to sustain the life support system on this planet. For various reasons, our forest is being slowly depleted....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1998

State Bank of India and Others Vs. M. Rajaiah and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : May-01-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 21, 136 and 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 18(1) and 36-A; Industrial Disputes Central Rules - Rules 9, 26 and 58

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD211; 1998(3)ALT727

Advocate for Appellant : M/s. Harish N. Salve, ;Sanjay Kapur and ;K. Gopala Krishna Murthy, Advs.

ORDERSyed Saadatulla Hussatni, J 1. The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was enacted by Parliament to make provisions for the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes. The legislation is enacted to ensure social justice to both employers...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2009

National Human Rights Commission Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 24(8), 25(1) and 51; Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, 1994; Organized Crime Control Act, 1970; Comprehensive Crime Control Act, 1984; Witness Security Reform Act, 1984; Witness Protection Act, 1996; Witness Protection Act, 1998; Director of Public Prosecutions Act, 1983; Prosecution of Offences Act, 1974; Crime Victims Rights Act, 2004; Criminal Proceudre Code , 1973 - Sections 25A, 164A, 173, 173(8) and 371(4)

Reported in : (2009)2GLR1672(SC); JT2009(6)SC405; 2009(6)SCALE509; (2009)6SCC342

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv., (A.C.),; Meenakshi Grover,; B.V. D

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. By order dated 26.3.2008 in this group of cases this Court had directed the Gujarat Government to constitute a five members Special Investigation Team (in short the `SIT') to be headed by Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 2008

Tata Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-09-2008

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(6) and 11(12); Companies Act, 1956; LCIA Arbitration Rules

Reported in : AIR2008SC2970; 2008(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2008BusLR683(SC); (2008)4CompLJ220(SC); JT2008(7)SC575; (2008)7MLJ734(SC); 2008(9)SCALE717; (2008)10SCC187; 2008(2)LC825(SC); 2008AIRSCW5015; 2008(4)CivilLJ91

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve,; R.F. Nariman and; Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Two companies, first being M/s. Tata Industries Ltd., and the second being M/s. Apex Investments (Mauritius) Holding Private Limited (hereinafter referred to Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) have approached this Court under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2001

Central Bank of India Vs. Ravindra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2001

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34, 34(1) and (2) - Order 6, 34, Rule 5 and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1956; Income Tax Act, 1918; Travancore Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 31; Usurious Loans Act, 1918; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 21, 21A, 35A and 46(4); Banking Regulation Act, 1935

Reported in : AIR2001SC3095; 2002(50)BLJR207; [2001]107CompCas416(SC); JT2001(9)SC101; 2002(1)KLT743(SC); (2002)1MLJ109(SC); RLW2002(2)SC241; 2001(7)SCALE351; (2002)1SCC367; 2002 (1) SCC 36

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General,; Rakesh Dwivedi and; K.N. B

ORDER After hearing learned Attorney General and amicus curiae S/Shri A. Subba Rao, Ranjit Kumar and K.M.K. Nair on (the interpretation of the provisions of Section 34 CPC on 'the principal sum adjudged' the matter is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2009

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 17, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 8 to 16 and 16(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 101(3) and 220(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 36 and 38; Advocates (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947; Dentists Act, 1948; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Pharmacy Act, 1948; High Court Rules - Rules 10, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 124, 124(3), 136, 138, 138(2), 145(1), 217, 217(1), 217(2), 224, 224(1), 226, 233, 233(2) and 246

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC199; 2009(9)SCALE206; (2009)8SCC273; 2009(3)SLJ385(SC); 2009(7)LC3083(SC); [2009] 10 SCR 921

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve and; Ravi Kiran Jain, Advs.,; Ashok Kr. Sriv

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The President of India by a Warrant dated 6.8.2008 under her hand and seal appointed Dr. Satish Chandra, Respondent No. 3 herein as Additional Judge of Allahabad High Court.2. The question for consideration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2004

Reserve Bank of India and anr. Vs. C.L. Toora and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-05-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 32; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2004SC2076; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)537; [2004(101)FLR434]; [2004(4)JCR56(SC)]; JT2004(4)SC258; (2004)IILLJ487SC; 2004(4)SCALE188; (2004)4SCC657; 2005(1)SLJ20(SC); 2004(2)LC1277

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv.,; H.S. Parihar,; Kuldeep Parihar

S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is filed by the Reserve Bank of India against the judgment and order of the High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur dated 12.12.2001 directing the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2000

Delhi Administration Vs. Gurdip Singh Uban and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-18-2000

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 40, Rules 3, 5 and 6 - Order 47, Rule 1; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6 and 48; Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925 - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; Delhi Land (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972; Constitution of India - Article 32; Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 - Sections 1 and 2

Reported in : JT2000(9)SC245; (2001)1MLJ45(SC); 2000(5)SCALE651; (2000)7SCC296; [2000]Supp2SCR496; AIR2000SC3737

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General,; K.N. Raval,; Additional

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. Krishna Iyer, J said that 'A plea for review, unless the first judicial view is manifestly distorted, is like asking for the moon'. [Northern India Caterers (I) Ltd. v. Lt. Governor of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2002

Ref. by President

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-28-2002

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 69, 69(2), 75, 79, 83, 85, 85(1), 85(2), 87, 88, 94, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 107, 107(5), 109, 110, 111, 123, 143, 143(1), 145(1), 147, 153, 159, 163, 164, 168, 169, 164(2), 164(4), 170, 171, 172, 172(1), 174, 174(1), 174(2), 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 193, 196, 196(5), 197, 197(2), 198, 202, 209, 213, 289, 290, 324 to 329, 352, 355, 356, 356(1), 360 and 368; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 14, 15, 15(2) and 73; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 63, 63D, 63D(1), 72B, 72B(1), 204(1) and 213; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1919 - Sections 8, 8(1), 21 and 21(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 18, 18(4), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 60, 61(3), 62, 62(1) and

Reported in : AIR2003SC87; (2002)8SCC237

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N Salve, Solicitor General,; Kirit N. Raval, Aditional Solicitor General,;

Acts/Rules/Orders: Constitution of India - Articles 69, 69(2), 75, 79, 83, 85, 85(1), 85(2), 87, 88, 94, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 107, 107(5), 109, 110, 111, 123, 143, 143(1), 145(1), 147, 153,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2008

N. Srihari (D) Through Lrs. and ors. Vs. N. Prakash and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-19-2008

Subject : Family

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Telangana) Area Abolition of Enams Act, 1955; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2008SC1548; 2008(4)ALT34; (SCSuppl)2008(2)CHN177; JT2008(3)SC255; 2008(2)SCALE709; (2008)4SCC683

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve,; L.N. Rao,; P.S. Mishra,;

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants herein are the unsuccessful defendants in O.S. No. 9 of 1993 on the file of the trial Court as well as the High Court. The LRs of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial