Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ex Parte Hagar

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1881
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84171

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
104 U.S. 520
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ex Parte Hagar

Excerpt

ex parte hagar - 104 u.s. 520 (1881) u.s. supreme court ex parte hagar, 104 u.s. 520 (1881) ex parte hagar 104 u.s. 520 petition for writ of prohibition the facts are stated in the opinion of the court. page 104 u. s. 521 mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. this is an application by the agent of the master, part-owner, and claimant of the british ship william law for a writ of prohibition to restrain the district court of the district of delaware, sitting in admiralty, from proceeding further in a suit pending in that court against the vessel to recover the half-pilotage, which is claimed to be due under the statutory regulations of delaware for refusing to accept the services of a pilot when tendered, outside of cape henlopen lighthouse, to conduct the ship to the delaware breakwater, where she was bound for orders. it has long been settled that claims for pilotage fees are within the jurisdiction of the admiralty. ex parte mcneil, 13 wall. 236; hobart v. drogan, 10 pet. 108. such being the case, under the decision just rendered in ex parte gordon, supra, p. 104 u. s. 515 , the district dourt can properly hear and decide the matters in dispute, and the application for the writ is accordingly denied.

Full Judgment

Ex Parte Hagar - 104 U.S. 520 (1881)
U.S. Supreme Court Ex Parte Hagar, 104 U.S. 520 (1881)

Ex Parte Hagar

104 U.S. 520

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 104 U. S. 521

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application by the agent of the master, part-owner, and claimant of the British ship William Law for a writ of prohibition to restrain the District Court of the District of Delaware, sitting in admiralty, from proceeding further in a suit pending in that court against the vessel to recover the half-pilotage, which is claimed to be due under the statutory regulations of Delaware for refusing to accept the services of a pilot when tendered, outside of Cape Henlopen lighthouse, to conduct the ship to the Delaware breakwater, where she was bound for orders. It has long been settled that claims for pilotage fees are within the jurisdiction of the admiralty. Ex parte McNeil, 13 Wall. 236; Hobart v. Drogan, 10 Pet. 108. Such being the case, under the decision just rendered in Ex Parte Gordon, supra, p. 104 U. S. 515 , the district dourt can properly hear and decide the matters in dispute, and the application for the writ is accordingly

Denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial