Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. C.E.G.A.T.

Commissioner of Central Excise vs C.E.G.A.T.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 24, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/827986

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Revision Case Petition No. 10 of 2001
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Advocate K. Veeraraghavan, Adv.

Respondent

C.E.G.A.T.

Advocate Arvind P. Datar, S.C. for ;Saravanan, Adv.

Legal References

Reported In
2001(134)ELT348(Mad)

Excerpt

- orderr . jayasimha babu, j.1. having heard counsel, we are satisfied that a question requiring our consideration does arise.2. the tribunal is directed to refer the following question:'whether the export of exempted goods will entitle the assessee to claim the benefit of modvat credit on the inputs?' 2. the tribunal is directed to submit a statement of the case together with the relevant materials for the purpose of deciding the question.

Full Judgment

ORDER

R . Jayasimha Babu, J.

1. Having heard Counsel, we are satisfied that a question requiring our consideration does arise.

2. The Tribunal is directed to refer the following question:

'Whether the export of exempted goods will entitle the assessee to claim the benefit of Modvat credit on the inputs?'

2. The Tribunal is directed to submit a statement of the case together with the relevant materials for the purpose of deciding the question.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial