Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Tarver Vs. Keach

Tarver vs Keach

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1872
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/82210

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
82 U.S. 67
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tarver

Respondent

Keach

Excerpt

tarver v. keach - 82 u.s. 67 (1872) u.s. supreme court tarver v. keach, 82 u.s. 15 wall. 67 67 (1872) tarver v. keach 82 u.s. (15 wall.) 67 on motion to dismiss writ of error to the supreme court of the state of texas syllabus when a decision holding a contract void is made by the highest court of a state upon the general principles by which courts determine that a transaction is good or bad on principles of public policy, the decision is one which this court is not authorized to review. the suit below was upon a note payable in common currency circulating in the state of texas at its maturity -- that is, on the 27th day of november, 1863. this common currency was confederate notes, and the note in question was given for the purchase of land. the supreme court of the state held that the transaction was a gambling one and dismissed the suit on that ground. the case being then brought here under an assumption that it came within the 25th section of the judiciary act, quoted supra, p. 82 u. s. 3 , the present motion was made. page 82 u. s. 68 the chief justice delivered the opinion of the court. in delmas v. insurance company, * decided at last term, we held that when "a decision holding a contract void is made by the highest court of a state upon the general principles by which courts determine that a transaction is good or bad on principles of public policy, the decision is one we are not authorized to review." we are entirely satisfied with that judgment and with the grounds assigned for it, and do not think it necessary to restate them. it follows that the writ of error to the supreme court of texas must be dismissed. * 14 wall. 661.

Full Judgment

Tarver v. Keach - 82 U.S. 67 (1872)
U.S. Supreme Court Tarver v. Keach, 82 U.S. 15 Wall. 67 67 (1872)

Tarver v. Keach

82 U.S. (15 Wall.) 67

ON MOTION TO DISMISS WRIT OF ERROR TO

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

SYLLABUS

When a decision holding a contract void is made by the highest court of a state upon the general principles by which courts determine that a transaction is good or bad on principles of public policy, the decision is one which this Court is not authorized to review.

The suit below was upon a note payable in common currency circulating in the State of Texas at its maturity -- that is, on the 27th day of November, 1863. This common currency was Confederate notes, and the note in question was given for the purchase of land.

The supreme court of the state held that the transaction was a gambling one and dismissed the suit on that ground. The case being then brought here under an assumption that it came within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, quoted supra, p. 82 U. S. 3 , the present motion was made.

Page 82 U. S. 68

THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the Court.

In Delmas v. Insurance Company, * decided at last term, we held that when

"a decision holding a contract void is made by the highest court of a state upon the general principles by which courts determine that a transaction is good or bad on principles of public policy, the decision is one we are not authorized to review."

We are entirely satisfied with that judgment and with the grounds assigned for it, and do not think it necessary to restate them. It follows that the writ of error to the Supreme Court of Texas must be

Dismissed.

* 14 Wall. 661.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial