Mcgrath Vs. C. Brachis

Mcgrath vs C. Brachis

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 28, 1910

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/818486

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/818486
Court: Chennai
Judge: Munro and ;Abdur Rahim, JJ.
Decided On: Jul 28, 1910
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Evidence - Expert witness--Material witness--Examination on commission. -

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mcgrath

Respondent

C. Brachis

Legal References

Reported In: 9Ind.Cas.347

Excerpt

evidence - expert witness--material witness--examination on commission. - order1. in the peculiar circumstances of the case we think that, as the expert in hand writing appears to be the principal witness in the case, the application to examine him on commission should not have been granted. we, therefore, set aside the order of the district magistrate directing commission to issue.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. In the peculiar circumstances of the case we think that, as the expert in hand writing appears to be the principal witness in the case, the application to examine him on Commission should not have been granted. We, therefore, set aside the order of the District Magistrate directing Commission to issue.

Same Parties Mcgrath vs C. Brachis Same Subject MRTP Same Judge Munro and ;Abdur Rahim, JJ.

MRTP