Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Hart

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1865
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/81333

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
70 U.S. 559
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Hart

Excerpt

.....under belligerent control and engage them in belligerent trade or permit them to be sent with contraband cargoes, under cover of false destination, to neutral ports while the real destination is to belligerent ports impress upon them the character of the belligerent in whose service they are employed, and the vessels may be seized and condemned as enemy property. the present case came here by appeal from a decree of the district court of the united states for the southern district of new york, a decree condemning the schooner hart and her cargo as lawful prize of war. the vessel was claimed below by one harris, the cargo by samuel isaacs. the whole cargo consisted of arms and munitions of war, taken on board, principally at london, under the direction of agents of the rebel government, with consent by the owner or owners of the schooner, to the intended fraud on belligerent rights. the nominal destination of the vessel and cargo was cardenas, but the preparatory proofs clearly established that this pretended destination was false and that the entire lading was to be there transshipped, to be conveyed by a swifter vessel, or was to be carried on without transshipment to its belligerent destination, at the discretion of the rebel agent, whose instructions the master was directed to receive and obey on arrival at cardenas. page 70 u. s. 560 the chief justice: the case in its principal features resembles that of the bermuda and her cargo; they are perhaps even more irreconcilable with neutral good faith. it is enough to say that neutrals who place their vessels under belligerent control and engage them in belligerent trade or permit them to be sent with contraband cargoes under cover of false destination to neutral ports, while the real destination is to belligerent ports, impress upon them the character of the belligerent in whose service they are employed, and cannot complain if they are seized and condemned as enemy.....

Full Judgment

The Hart - 70 U.S. 559 (1865)
U.S. Supreme Court The Hart, 70 U.S. 3 Wall. 559 559 (1865)

The Hart

70 U.S. (3 Wall.) 559

APPEAL FROM A DECREE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SYLLABUS

Neutrals who place their vessels under belligerent control and engage them in belligerent trade or permit them to be sent with contraband cargoes, under cover of false destination, to neutral ports while the real destination is to belligerent ports impress upon them the character of the belligerent in whose service they are employed, and the vessels may be seized and condemned as enemy property.

The present case came here by appeal from a decree of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, a decree condemning the schooner Hart and her cargo as lawful prize of war. The vessel was claimed below by one Harris, the cargo by Samuel Isaacs.

The whole cargo consisted of arms and munitions of war, taken on board, principally at London, under the direction of agents of the rebel government, with consent by the owner or owners of the schooner, to the intended fraud on belligerent rights. The nominal destination of the vessel and cargo was Cardenas, but the preparatory proofs clearly established that this pretended destination was false and that the entire lading was to be there transshipped, to be conveyed by a swifter vessel, or was to be carried on without transshipment to its belligerent destination, at the discretion of the rebel agent, whose instructions the master was directed to receive and obey on arrival at Cardenas.

Page 70 U. S. 560

THE CHIEF JUSTICE:

The case in its principal features resembles that of the Bermuda and her cargo; they are perhaps even more irreconcilable with neutral good faith.

It is enough to say that neutrals who place their vessels under belligerent control and engage them in belligerent trade or permit them to be sent with contraband cargoes under cover of false destination to neutral ports, while the real destination is to belligerent ports, impress upon them the character of the belligerent in whose service they are employed, and cannot complain if they are seized and condemned as enemy property.

The principles recognized in the preceding case require the affirmance of the decree of the district court. and it is

Affirmed accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial