Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gordon Vs. United States

Gordon vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1864
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/81265

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
69 U.S. 561
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gordon

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

gordon v. united states - 69 u.s. 561 (1864) u.s. supreme court gordon v. united states, 69 u.s. 2 wall. 561 561 (1864) gordon v. united states 69 u.s. (2 wall.) 561 appeal from the court of claims syllabus no appeal lies to this court from the court of claims. gordon, administrator of fisher, presented a petition in the court of claims of the united states, for damages done to him by troops of our government in the war of 1812 with great britain. the court of claims decided against him, and he appealed to this court. the case was argued in favor of the right of appeal by messrs. gooderich and winter davis; no counsel appearing on the other side. a majority of the court, however, * finding itself constrained to the conclusion that, under the constitution, no appellate jurisdiction over the court of claims could be exercised by this court, and intimating that the reasons which necessitated this view might be announced hereafter -- the term being now at its close -- the cause was simply dismissed for want of jurisdiction. * miller and field, jj., dissenting.

Full Judgment

Gordon v. United States - 69 U.S. 561 (1864)
U.S. Supreme Court Gordon v. United States, 69 U.S. 2 Wall. 561 561 (1864)

Gordon v. United States

69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 561

APPEAL FROM THE

COURT OF CLAIMS

SYLLABUS

No appeal lies to this Court from the Court of Claims.

Gordon, administrator of Fisher, presented a petition in the Court of Claims of the United States, for damages done to him by troops of our government in the war of 1812 with Great Britain. The Court of Claims decided against him, and he appealed to this Court. The case was argued in favor of the right of appeal by Messrs. Gooderich and Winter Davis; no counsel appearing on the other side. A majority of the Court, however, * finding itself constrained to the conclusion that, under the Constitution, no appellate jurisdiction over the Court of Claims could be exercised by this Court, and intimating that the reasons which necessitated this view might be announced hereafter -- the term being now at its close -- the cause was simply

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

* MILLER and FIELD, JJ., dissenting.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial