Full Judgment
ORDER
Lakshmana Rao, J.
1. The interpretation of Rule 1(d) of the Timber Transit Rules of 1939 by the Courts below is correct and there is no ground for interference. The revision petition is therefore dismissed.
Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.
In Re: Nachi Naicker and ors.
Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.
Log in to unlock AI StudioSubscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.
1. The interpretation of Rule 1(d) of the Timber Transit Rules of 1939 by the Courts below is correct and there is no ground for interference. The revision petition is therefore dismissed.
Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files
Start your Free Trial