Full Judgment
ORDER
Lakshmana Rao, J.
1. The interpretation of Rule 1(d) of the Timber Transit Rules of 1939 by the Courts below is correct and there is no ground for interference. The revision petition is therefore dismissed.
In Re: Nachi Naicker and ors.
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/811679
- Court
- Chennai
- Decided On
- Jan 30, 1941
- Subject
- civils
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
-
- Key legal issue
- civils
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
In Re: Nachi Naicker and ors.
Legal References
- Reported In
- AIR1941Mad809
Excerpt
- orderlakshmana rao, j.1. the interpretation of rule 1(d) of the timber transit rules of 1939 by the courts below is correct and there is no ground for interference. the revision petition is therefore dismissed.