Advanced Search Results

Mohamed Mujeebur Rahman Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 92; Wakf Act, 1995 - Section 83(5)

the scheme decree dated 10.2.1941 made in O.S.No.63 of 1940 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.2.1. The Fazilathunnissa Begum Sahiba Mosque Endowment (for brevity, the Mosque Endowment) is situated in Anna Salai,

Zenith Gwar Gum and ors. Vs. United Bank of India

Court : DRAT Delhi

Subject : Civil

legal ground that the Debts Recovery Tribunal has no jurisdiction/power to set aside a decree passed by a civil Court. In respect of the rest two applications, the learned Presiding Officer has said that the same could

Keshri Chand Vs. Shodai @ Soidai @ Savitri and Anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Civil

been filed by the defendant No.1, Keshri Chand s/o Rewat Ram under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 16.07.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Churu in Civil Original Suit

Bulu Mazumdar and ors. Legal Heirs of Mon Kr. Mazumdar Vs. Department ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

filed by it by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 24.06.99 and 29.06.99, respectively, passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur, dismissing the suit.2. The Respondent herein filed Money Suit No. 9/93 against

Sudarshan Plywood Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 11A, 11A(1), 35, 35A, 35A(3), 35E and 35E(3); Civil Rules; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 10, 53, 173B, 173C, 173F, 173G(1), 173G(4), 226 and 233A; Constitution of India - Article 226

J.N. Sharma, J.1. All these three Civil Rules raise the same question of law and facts and as such they are taken up for hearing

Tarun Chandra Dey Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22(1)

1. The question pertaining to interpretation of the provision of Order XLI Rule 22(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure is involved identically in both the cases and as such these are taken together for hearing and

Ganesh Prasad Vs. Lakshman Dusadh and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rules 4 and 9 - Order 43, Rule 1(C)

S.N. Hussain, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This civil revision has been filed by the plaintiff of Title Suit No. 7/1983 which was filed for declaration of

Hadir Nilufar Khalil Vs. Jalalur Rahman

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rules 9, 11 and 13 - Order 71, Rule 11

J.1. The rejection of the plaint in title suit No. 13/99 vide order dated 16.3.2001 by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Golaghat and or dismissal of the suit has resulted into this First Appeal. The plaintiff

Jatindra Mohan Deb and ors. Vs. Rajani Kanta Choudhury

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Debt Law; Assam Money Lenders' (Amendment) Act, 1943 - Sections 1(2) and 9(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 34, Rules 5 and 6

passed on 13-5-1940. On 24-9-47 the mortgagee applied for a personal decree under Rule 6 of Order 34, Civil P. C. The trial Court passed a personal decree against the mortgagors in the sum of Rs. 500

Sri Rakesh Kumar Saraf Vs. the Administrator, Bhagalpur Municipal Corp ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 5 - Order 9, Rules 6 and 13

was decreed. Defendant, aggrieved by the same, filed application Under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, hereinafter referred to as 'CPC', for setting aside the aforesaid ex parte judgment and decree. Said case