Strader Vs. Graham

Strader vs Graham

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1855

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/80640

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/80640
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1855
Case Number: 59 U.S. 602
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Strader

Respondent

Graham

Excerpt

strader v. graham - 59 u.s. 602 (1855) u.s. supreme court strader v. graham, 59 u.s. 602 (1855) 59 u.s. 602 (how.) jacob strader and others, plaintiffs in error, v. christopher graham. december term, 1855 this case was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, at december term, 1850, 10 how. 82. at the present term, mr. crittenden, of counsel for the defendant in error, moved the court to amend the judgment entered in this cause at the december term, 1950, and to give a judgment for the costs in this court in favor of his client. whereupon it is now here considered by the court that this court cannot give a judgment for costs in a case dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and it appearing to this court that this cause has been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it is thereupon now here ordered by the court that the said motion be and the same is hereby overruled.[ strader v. graham 59 u.s. 602 (1855) ]

Full Judgment

STRADER v. GRAHAM - 59 U.S. 602 (1855)
U.S. Supreme Court STRADER v. GRAHAM, 59 U.S. 602 (1855)

59 U.S. 602 (How.)

JACOB STRADER AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM.

December Term, 1855

THIS case was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, at December term, 1850, 10 How. 82.

At the present term, Mr. Crittenden, of counsel for the defendant in error, moved the court to amend the judgment entered in this cause at the December term, 1950, and to give a judgment for the costs in this court in favor of his client. Whereupon it is now here considered by the court that this court cannot give a judgment for costs in a case dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and it appearing to this court that this cause has been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it is thereupon now here ordered by the court that the said motion be and the same is hereby overruled.[ Strader v. Graham 59 U.S. 602 (1855) ]

Same Parties Strader vs Graham Same Subject Service Tax