Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Subramania Ayyar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 01, 1913
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/804369

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 530 - Bench of Magistrates--Conviction--Some not having heard evidence, effect of. -

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Subramania Ayyar

Legal References

Cases Referred
and Damri Thakur v. Bhowani Sahoo
Reported In
29Ind.Cas.329

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 530 - bench of magistrates--conviction--some not having heard evidence, effect of. - order1. in this case the petitioner was convicted by a bench of five magistrates, one of whom had not heard all the evidence. this vitiates the conviction-vide section 530 of the criminal procedure code, and hardwar singh lal v. khega ojha 20 c.p 870 [followed in queen-empress v. basappa 18 m.p 394 : 2 weir 17 and damri thakur v. bhowani sahoo 23 c.p 194. the conviction and sentence are set aside, and a re-trial is ordered.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. In this case the petitioner was convicted by a Bench of five Magistrates, one of whom had not heard all the evidence. This vitiates the conviction-vide Section 530 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and Hardwar Singh Lal v. Khega Ojha 20 C.P 870 [followed in Queen-Empress v. Basappa 18 M.P 394 : 2 Weir 17 and Damri Thakur v. Bhowani Sahoo 23 C.P 194. The conviction and sentence are set aside, and a re-trial is ordered.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial