Queen-empress Vs. Basappa

Queen-empress vs Basappa

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 03, 1895

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/778654

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/778654
Court: Chennai
Judge: Arthur J.H. Collins, C.J. and ;Best, J.
Decided On: Apr 03, 1895
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Act X of 1882, Sections 16, 350--Bench of Magistrates--Change in constitution of the Court during a trial. -

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-empress

Respondent

Basappa

Legal References

Cases Referred: Hardwar Sing v. Khega Ojha I.L.R.
Reported In: (1895)ILR18Mad394

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - act x of 1882, sections 16, 350--bench of magistrates--change in constitution of the court during a trial. - 1. following the decision of the calcutta high court in hardwar sing v. khega ojha i.l.r. 20 cal. 870 with which we entirely agree, we set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that the fine, if paid be refunded and the case retried.

Full Judgment

1. Following the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Hardwar Sing v. Khega Ojha I.L.R. 20 Cal. 870 with which we entirely agree, we set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that the fine, if paid be refunded and the case retried.

Same Parties Queen-empress vs Basappa Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Arthur J.H. Collins, C.J. and ;Best, J.

Criminal high court set aside