Hogan Vs. Ross

Hogan vs Ross

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1850

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/80166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/80166
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1850
Case Number: 50 U.S. 602
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hogan

Respondent

Ross

Excerpt

hogan v. ross - 50 u.s. 602 (1850) u.s. supreme court hogan v. ross, 50 u.s. 602 (1850) 50 u.s. 602 (how.) smith hogan, arthur s. hogan, and richard y. reynolds, plaintiffs in error, v. aaron ross, who sues for the use of robert patterson. january term, 1850 this case was brought up, by writ of error, from the district court of the united states for the northern district of mississippi. page 50 u.s. 602, 603 the order of the court explains the ground of its dismissal, upon the motion of mr. coxe. order this cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the united states for the northern district of mississippi, and on the motion of richard s. coxe, esquire, of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.

Full Judgment

HOGAN v. ROSS - 50 U.S. 602 (1850)
U.S. Supreme Court HOGAN v. ROSS, 50 U.S. 602 (1850)

50 U.S. 602 (How.)

SMITH HOGAN, ARTHUR S. HOGAN, AND RICHARD Y. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
AARON ROSS, WHO SUES FOR THE USE OF ROBERT PATTERSON.

January Term, 1850

THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi.

Page 50 U.S. 602, 603

The order of the court explains the ground of its dismissal, upon the motion of Mr. Coxe.

ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire, of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.

Same Parties Hogan vs Ross Same Subject MRTP