Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Engine Valves Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Engine Valves Ltd. vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 01, 1990
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/797834

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition Nos. 9755 to 9764 of 1982
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Held: Classification - Valve steel being distinct from stainless steel, falls U/H. 73.15(1) of CTA. Refund admissible; bank guarantees to be discharged.Petitions allowed. -

Key legal issue
Customs
Acts & sections
Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Engine Valves Ltd.

Advocate Shri Sriram Panchu, Adv.

Respondent

Union of India

Advocate Shri P. Narasimhan, Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel

Legal References

Reported In
1994LC519(Madras); 1992(58)ELT25(Mad)

Excerpt

held: classification - valve steel being distinct from stainless steel, falls u/h. 73.15(1) of cta. refund admissible; bank guarantees to be discharged.petitions allowed. - order1. in all these writ petitions, the question is whether the valve steel should be classified under clause 1 of 73.15 of the customs tariff or whether it should be classified under clause 2 of 73.15 of the customs tariff. according to the revenue it must be classified as stainless steel under clause 2 and according to the petitioners it should be classified under clause 1 which will entitle them to a lesser customs duty. it is not disputed before me that subsequent to the filing or writ petitions, the collector of madras in his order dated 18-5-1985 made in c3/1809 and 1810/83 and c3/86/1984 has accepted the contention of the petitioners and has held that the valve steel in question is different and distinct from stainless steel and therefore eligible to be classified under 73.15(1) of customs tariff. the learned counsel, appearing for the respondents says that the authorities are now following the said judgment of collector of madras (appeals). in view of this, all the writ petitions are allowed and there will be a direction to classify the valve steel involved in these cases under 73.15(1) of the customs tariff and consequent refund to the petitioners in payment of duty. the writ petitions are ordered in the above terms. there will be not order as to costs. it is stated that the petitioners have given bank guarantees for the difference of the amount pending disposal of the writ petitions. it goes without saying that the bank guarantees will be discharged and released in favour of the petitioners.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. In all these writ petitions, the question is whether the valve steel should be classified under Clause 1 of 73.15 of the Customs Tariff or whether it should be classified under Clause 2 of 73.15 of the Customs Tariff. According to the Revenue it must be classified as Stainless steel under Clause 2 and according to the petitioners it should be classified under Clause 1 which will entitle them to a lesser Customs Duty. It is not disputed before me that subsequent to the filing or writ petitions, the Collector of Madras in his order dated 18-5-1985 made in C3/1809 and 1810/83 and C3/86/1984 has accepted the contention of the petitioners and has held that the Valve Steel in question is different and distinct from Stainless Steel and therefore eligible to be classified under 73.15(1) of Customs Tariff. The learned Counsel, appearing for the respondents says that the authorities are now following the said judgment of Collector of Madras (Appeals). In view of this, all the writ petitions are allowed and there will be a direction to classify the Valve Steel involved in these cases under 73.15(1) of the Customs Tariff and consequent refund to the petitioners in payment of duty. The writ petitions are ordered in the above terms. There will be not order as to costs. It is stated that the petitioners have given bank guarantees for the difference of the amount pending disposal of the writ petitions. It goes without saying that the bank guarantees will be discharged and released in favour of the petitioners.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial